mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud

arXiv 2109.03285 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2021cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the predictions made by machine learning (ML) models and their potential biases remains a challenging and labor-intensive task that depends on the application, the dataset, and the specific model. We present Amazon SageMaker Clarify, an explainability feature for Amazon SageMaker that launched in December 2020, providing insights into data and ML models by identifying biases and explaining predictions. It is deeply integrated into Amazon SageMaker, a fully managed service that enables data scientists and developers to build, train, and deploy ML models at any scale. Clarify supports bias detection and feature importance computation across the ML lifecycle, during data preparation, model evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring. We outline the desiderata derived from customer input, the modular architecture, and the methodology for bias and explanation computations. Further, we describe the technical challenges encountered and the tradeoffs we had to make. For illustration, we discuss two customer use cases. We present our deployment results including qualitative customer feedback and a quantitative evaluation. Finally, we summarize lessons learned, and discuss best practices for the successful adoption of fairness and explanation tools in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2021.

Builds on

34 of 57 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  7. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  8. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  9. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  10. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  11. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  12. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
22 more
  1. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  2. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  3. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  4. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  5. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  6. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  7. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  8. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  9. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  10. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
  11. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  12. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
  13. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  14. 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
  15. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  16. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  17. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  18. 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
  19. 2020Fair Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
  20. 2020LiFT: A Scalable Framework for Measuring Fairness in ML Applicationscited by 22
  21. 2018Simplicity Creates Inequity: Implications for Fairness, Stereotypes, and Interpretabilitycited by 16
  22. 2021Defuse: Harnessing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples for Debugging Models Beyond Test Accuracycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applicationscited by 27
  2. 2021Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor: A System for Real-Time Insights into Deployed Machine Learning Modelscited by 16
  3. 2024OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 12
  4. 2022A Human-Centric Take on Model Monitoringcited by 9
  5. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  6. 2024Implications of the AI Act for Non-Discrimination Law and Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 5
  7. 2025Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harmscited by 5
  8. 2023ICON2: Reliably Benchmarking Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 2
  9. 2023Machine Learning practices and infrastructurescited by 2
  10. 2023Data augmentation and explainability for bias discovery and mitigation in deep learningcited by 2
  11. 2022EdnaML: A Declarative API and Framework for Reproducible Deep Learningcited by 1
  12. 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecyclecited by 1
7 more
  1. 2025FairSense-AI: Responsible AI Meets Sustainabilitycited by 1
  2. 2026Statistical Inference and Learning for Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)cited by 1
  3. 2022Constructive Interpretability with CoLabel: Corroborative Integration, Complementary Features, and Collaborative Learningcited by 0
  4. 2022ComplAI: Theory of A Unified Framework for Multi-factor Assessment of Black-Box Supervised Machine Learning Modelscited by 0
  5. 2024DispaRisk: Auditing Fairness Through Usable Informationcited by 0
  6. 2025Ratio1 -- AI meta-OScited by 0
  7. 2025Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Studycited by 0