mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DispaRisk: Auditing Fairness Through Usable Information

arXiv 2405.12372 ↗First posted 20 May 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning algorithms (ML) impact virtually every aspect of human lives and have found use across diverse sectors including healthcare, finance, and education. Often, ML algorithms have been found to exacerbate societal biases present in datasets leading to adversarial impacts on subsets/groups of individuals and in many cases on minority groups. To effectively mitigate these untoward effects, it is crucial that disparities/biases are identified early in a ML pipeline. This proactive approach facilitates timely interventions to prevent bias amplification and reduce complexity at later stages of model development. In this paper, we leverage recent advancements in usable information theory to introduce DispaRisk, a novel framework designed to proactively assess the potential risks of disparities in datasets during the initial stages of the ML pipeline. We evaluate DispaRisk's effectiveness by benchmarking it against commonly used datasets in fairness research. Our findings demonstrate DispaRisk's capabilities to identify datasets with a high risk of discrimination, detect model families prone to biases within an ML pipeline, and enhance the explainability of these bias risks. This work contributes to the development of fairer ML systems by providing a robust tool for early bias detection and mitigation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2024.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  7. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  8. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  9. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  10. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  11. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  12. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
16 more
  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  3. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  6. 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 194
  7. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  8. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 153
  9. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  10. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  11. 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 53
  12. 2021What Context Features Can Transformer Language Models Use?cited by 49
  13. 2021Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimationcited by 45
  14. 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
  15. 2021Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloudcited by 19
  16. 2020Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Biascited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.