mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Statistical Inference and Learning for Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)

arXiv 2602.10532 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The SHAP (short for Shapley additive explanation) framework has become an essential tool for attributing importance to variables in predictive tasks. In model-agnostic settings, SHAP uses the concept of Shapley values from cooperative game theory to fairly allocate credit to the features in a vector X based on their contribution to an outcome Y. While the explanations offered by SHAP are local by nature, learners often need global measures of feature importance in order to improve model explainability and perform feature selection. The most common approach for converting these local explanations into global ones is to compute either the mean absolute SHAP or mean squared SHAP. However, despite their ubiquity, there do not exist approaches for performing statistical inference on these quantities. In this paper, we take a semi-parametric approach for calibrating confidence in estimates of the pth powers of Shapley additive explanations. We show that, by treating the SHAP curve as a nuisance function that must be estimated from data, one can reliably construct asymptotically normal estimates of the pth powers of SHAP. When p ≥ 2, we show a de-biased estimator that combines U-statistics with Neyman orthogonal scores for functionals of nested regressions is asymptotically normal. When 1 ≤ p < 2 (and the hence target parameter is not twice differentiable), we construct de-biased U-statistics for a smoothed alternative. In particular, we show how to carefully tune the temperature parameter of the smoothing function in order to obtain inference for the true, unsmoothed pth power. We complement these results by presenting a Neyman orthogonal loss that can be used to learn the SHAP curve via empirical risk minimization and discussing excess risk guarantees for commonly used function classes.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

32 of 69 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  6. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
  7. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  8. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  9. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  10. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  11. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
  12. 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 150
20 more
  1. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  2. 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 114
  3. 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
  4. 2013Counterfactual Probabilities: Computational Methods, Bounds and Applicationscited by 67
  5. 2020Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley valuescited by 61
  6. 2018Orthogonal Random Forest for Causal Inferencecited by 51
  7. 2020A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importancecited by 44
  8. 2021RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forestscited by 42
  9. 2021Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloudcited by 19
  10. 2023Decomposing Global Feature Effects Based on Feature Interactionscited by 17
  11. 2023Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Covariate Shiftscited by 15
  12. 2023Covariate-assisted bounds on causal effects with instrumental variablescited by 10
  13. 2022Powershap: A Power-full Shapley Feature Selection Methodcited by 7
  14. 2023A feature selection method based on Shapley values robust to concept shift in regressioncited by 6
  15. 2024Orthogonal Causal Calibrationcited by 5
  16. 2023Inference on Optimal Dynamic Policies via Softmax Approximationcited by 3
  17. 2022Shapley Curves: A Smoothing Perspectivecited by 2
  18. 2023Total Variation Floodgate for Variable Importance Inference in Classificationcited by 1
  19. 2024Shap-Select: Lightweight Feature Selection Using SHAP Values and Regressioncited by 1
  20. 2025Inference on Variable Importance for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: Shapley Values and Beyondcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.