mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ComplAI: Theory of A Unified Framework for Multi-factor Assessment of Black-Box Supervised Machine Learning Models

arXiv 2212.14599 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advances in Artificial Intelligence are creating new opportunities to improve lives of people around the world, from business to healthcare, from lifestyle to education. For example, some systems profile the users using their demographic and behavioral characteristics to make certain domain-specific predictions. Often, such predictions impact the life of the user directly or indirectly (e.g., loan disbursement, determining insurance coverage, shortlisting applications, etc.). As a result, the concerns over such AI-enabled systems are also increasing. To address these concerns, such systems are mandated to be responsible i.e., transparent, fair, and explainable to developers and end-users. In this paper, we present ComplAI, a unique framework to enable, observe, analyze and quantify explainability, robustness, performance, fairness, and model behavior in drift scenarios, and to provide a single Trust Factor that evaluates different supervised Machine Learning models not just from their ability to make correct predictions but from overall responsibility perspective. The framework helps users to (a) connect their models and enable explanations, (b) assess and visualize different aspects of the model, such as robustness, drift susceptibility, and fairness, and (c) compare different models (from different model families or obtained through different hyperparameter settings) from an overall perspective thereby facilitating actionable recourse for improvement of the models. It is model agnostic and works with different supervised machine learning scenarios (i.e., Binary Classification, Multi-class Classification, and Regression) and frameworks. It can be seamlessly integrated with any ML life-cycle framework. Thus, this already deployed framework aims to unify critical aspects of Responsible AI systems for regulating the development process of such real systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  6. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
  7. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  8. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
  9. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  10. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
  11. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
  12. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
4 more
  1. 2019Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms for Behavioral and Textual Datacited by 26
  2. 2020Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approachcited by 26
  3. 2021Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloudcited by 19
  4. 2019A study of data and label shift in the LIME frameworkcited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.