mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Defuse: Harnessing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples for Debugging Models Beyond Test Accuracy

arXiv 2102.06162 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We typically compute aggregate statistics on held-out test data to assess the generalization of machine learning models. However, statistics on test data often overstate model generalization, and thus, the performance of deployed machine learning models can be variable and untrustworthy. Motivated by these concerns, we develop methods to automatically discover and correct model errors beyond those available in the data. We propose Defuse, a method that generates novel model misclassifications, categorizes these errors into high-level model bugs, and efficiently labels and fine-tunes on the errors to correct them. To generate misclassified data, we propose an algorithm inspired by adversarial machine learning techniques that uses a generative model to find naturally occurring instances misclassified by a model. Further, we observe that the generative models have regions in their latent space with higher concentrations of misclassifications. We call these regions misclassification regions and find they have several useful properties. Each region contains a specific type of model bug; for instance, a misclassification region for an MNIST classifier contains a style of skinny 6 that the model mistakes as a 1. We can also assign a single label to each region, facilitating low-cost labeling. We propose a method to learn the misclassification regions and use this insight to both categorize errors and correct them. In practice, Defuse finds and corrects novel errors in classifiers. For example, Defuse shows that a high-performance traffic sign classifier mistakes certain 50km/h signs as 80km/h. Defuse corrects the error after fine-tuning while maintaining generalization on the test set.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2021.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  8. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  9. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  10. 2014Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 494
  11. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  12. 2017Data Augmentation Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
9 more
  1. 2016Adversarially Learned Inferencecited by 216
  2. 2017Generating Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 182
  3. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  4. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  5. 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 67
  6. 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  7. 2018Training Set Debugging Using Trusted Itemscited by 24
  8. 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
  9. 2016Socratic Learning: Augmenting Generative Models to Incorporate Latent Subsets in Training Datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.