mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications

arXiv 2205.13619 ↗First posted 26 May 2022cs.IR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As one of the most pervasive applications of machine learning, recommender systems are playing an important role on assisting human decision making. The satisfaction of users and the interests of platforms are closely related to the quality of the generated recommendation results. However, as a highly data-driven system, recommender system could be affected by data or algorithmic bias and thus generate unfair results, which could weaken the reliance of the systems. As a result, it is crucial to address the potential unfairness problems in recommendation settings. Recently, there has been growing attention on fairness considerations in recommender systems with more and more literature on approaches to promote fairness in recommendation. However, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization, thus making it difficult to penetrate for new researchers to the domain. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing works on fairness in recommendation. This survey focuses on the foundations for fairness in recommendation literature. It first presents a brief introduction about fairness in basic machine learning tasks such as classification and ranking in order to provide a general overview of fairness research, as well as introduce the more complex situations and challenges that need to be considered when studying fairness in recommender systems. After that, the survey will introduce fairness in recommendation with a focus on the taxonomies of current fairness definitions, the typical techniques for improving fairness, as well as the datasets for fairness studies in recommendation. The survey also talks about the challenges and opportunities in fairness research with the hope of promoting the fair recommendation research area and beyond.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 153 of its 283 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

Builds on

153 of 283 references.

References · 153

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  5. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  6. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  9. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  10. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  11. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  12. 2022Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5)cited by 396
38 more
  1. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  2. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  3. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
  4. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  5. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  6. 2020XGNN: Towards Model-Level Explanations of Graph Neural Networkscited by 211
  7. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  8. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
  9. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  10. 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 187
  11. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
  12. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
  13. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  14. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  15. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
  16. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  17. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  18. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  19. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  20. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  21. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  22. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 123
  23. 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
  24. 2021CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
  25. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  26. 2019Reinforcement Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Explainable Recommendationcited by 102
  27. 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
  28. 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  29. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  30. 2018Grounding Visual Explanationscited by 92
  31. 2019RecSim: A Configurable Simulation Platform for Recommender Systemscited by 91
  32. 2020Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systemscited by 89
  33. 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
  34. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  35. 2019Federated Collaborative Filtering for Privacy-Preserving Personalized Recommendation Systemcited by 79
  36. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  37. 2022Learning and Evaluating Graph Neural Network Explanations based on Counterfactual and Factual Reasoningcited by 78
  38. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77

50 most cited of 153 All 153 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 7.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Fairness of ChatGPTcited by 19
  2. 2024SPRec: Self-Play to Debias LLM-based Recommendationcited by 18
  3. 2023Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Modelscited by 7
  4. 2024Unveiling Bias in Fairness Evaluations of Large Language Models: A Critical Literature Review of Music and Movie Recommendation Systemscited by 7
  5. 2024Recommender Systems for Sustainability: Overview and Research Issuescited by 5
  6. 2024Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challengescited by 4
  7. 2025Stairway to Fairness: Connecting Group and Individual Fairnesscited by 3
  8. 2023Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluationcited by 2
  9. 2024Long-term Fairness For Real-time Decision Making: A Constrained Online Optimization Approachcited by 2
  10. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Data Heterogeneity in Recommendationcited by 1
  11. 2024Bipartite Graph Variational Auto-Encoder with Fair Latent Representation to Account for Sampling Bias in Ecological Networkscited by 1
  12. 2025Recommending the right academic programs: An interest mining approach using BERTopiccited by 1
15 more
  1. 2025Alleviating User-Sensitive bias with Fair Generative Sequential Recommendation Modelcited by 1
  2. 2025A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendationcited by 1
  3. 2026Fair Recourse for All: Ensuring Individual and Group Fairness in Counterfactual Explanationscited by 1
  4. 2026Measuring Individual User Fairness with User Similarity and Effectiveness Disparitycited by 1
  5. 2024dsld: A Socially Relevant Tool for Teaching Statisticscited by 0
  6. 2024Understanding Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Machine Learning Models: Does Promoting Fairness Undermine Performance?cited by 0
  7. 2025Towards Responsible AI in Education: Hybrid Recommendation System for K-12 Students Case Studycited by 0
  8. 2025Learning Marked Temporal Point Process Explanations based on Counterfactual and Factual Reasoningcited by 0
  9. 2025Understanding Distribution Structure on Calibrated Recommendation Systemscited by 0
  10. 2025Model-agnostic post-hoc explainability for recommender systemscited by 0
  11. 2026Ideological Isolation in Online Social Networks: A Survey of Computational Definitions, Metrics, and Mitigation Strategiescited by 0
  12. 2026Post-Training Fairness Control: A Single-Train Framework for Dynamic Fairness in Recommendationcited by 0
  13. 2026When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Toolscited by 0
  14. 2026Fairness Attacks on Recommender Systemscited by 0
  15. 2026Consensus vs. Dissent: Dynamic LLM Modeling of Subjective Preferences in Group Recommenderscited by 0