mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification

arXiv 2106.03761 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LG stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite being widely used, face recognition models suffer from bias: the probability of a false positive (incorrect face match) strongly depends on sensitive attributes such as the ethnicity of the face. As a result, these models can disproportionately and negatively impact minority groups, particularly when used by law enforcement. The majority of bias reduction methods have several drawbacks: they use an end-to-end retraining approach, may not be feasible due to privacy issues, and often reduce accuracy. An alternative approach is post-processing methods that build fairer decision classifiers using the features of pre-trained models, thus avoiding the cost of retraining. However, they still have drawbacks: they reduce accuracy (AGENDA, PASS, FTC), or require retuning for different false positive rates (FSN). In this work, we introduce the Fairness Calibration (FairCal) method, a post-training approach that simultaneously: (i) increases model accuracy (improving the state-of-the-art), (ii) produces fairly-calibrated probabilities, (iii) significantly reduces the gap in the false positive rates, (iv) does not require knowledge of the sensitive attribute, and (v) does not require retraining, training an additional model, or retuning. We apply it to the task of Face Verification, and obtain state-of-the-art results with all the above advantages.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

28 of 56 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,005
  3. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  4. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 913
  5. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 898
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  7. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  8. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 585
  9. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
  10. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  11. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  12. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 360
16 more
  1. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  2. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  3. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  4. 2020Calibration of Neural Networks using Splinescited by 97
  5. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  6. 2018Deep Imbalanced Learning for Face Recognition and Attribute Predictioncited by 90
  7. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  8. 2019Striking the Right Balance with Uncertaintycited by 79
  9. 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
  10. 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
  11. 2018Exploring Disentangled Feature Representation Beyond Face Identificationcited by 36
  12. 2020Post-Comparison Mitigation of Demographic Bias in Face Recognition Using Fair Score Normalizationcited by 28
  13. 2020Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binningcited by 27
  14. 2018From Soft Classifiers to Hard Decisions: How fair can we be?cited by 16
  15. 2020Towards Gender-Neutral Face Descriptors for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 11
  16. 2019Additive Adversarial Learning for Unbiased Authenticationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: