Mitigating Bias in Facial Recognition Systems: Centroid Fairness Loss Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The urging societal demand for fair AI systems has put pressure on the research community to develop predictive models that are not only globally accurate but also meet new fairness criteria, reflecting the lack of disparate mistreatment with respect to sensitive attributes (textite.g. gender, ethnicity, age). In particular, the variability of the errors made by certain Facial Recognition (FR) systems across specific segments of the population compromises the deployment of the latter, and was judged unacceptable by regulatory authorities. Designing fair FR systems is a very challenging problem, mainly due to the complex and functional nature of the performance measure used in this domain (textiti.e. ROC curves) and because of the huge heterogeneity of the face image datasets usually available for training. In this paper, we propose a novel post-processing approach to improve the fairness of pre-trained FR models by optimizing a regression loss which acts on centroid-based scores. Beyond the computational advantages of the method, we present numerical experiments providing strong empirical evidence of the gain in fairness and of the ability to preserve global accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2025.
Builds on
21 of 34 references.
References · 21
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2017NormFace: L2 Hypersphere Embedding for Face Verificationcited by 237
- 2018MobileFaceNets: Efficient CNNs for Accurate Real-Time Face Verification on Mobile Devicescited by 182
- 2016Deep Pyramidal Residual Networkscited by 163
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
- 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
- 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
- 2022Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 53
- 2017von Mises-Fisher Mixture Model-based Deep learning: Application to Face Verificationcited by 46
9 more
- 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
- 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
- 2020Post-Comparison Mitigation of Demographic Bias in Face Recognition Using Fair Score Normalizationcited by 28
- 2020FairFace Challenge at ECCV 2020: Analyzing Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 26
- 2021Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasetscited by 22
- 2021FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verificationcited by 17
- 2022Mitigating Gender Bias in Face Recognition Using the von Mises-Fisher Mixture Modelcited by 12
- 2019A New Loss Function for CNN Classifier Based on Pre-defined Evenly-Distributed Class Centroidscited by 10
- 2022Assessing Uncertainty in Similarity Scoring: Performance & Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.