mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Strategic Classification With Externalities

arXiv 2410.08032 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.GT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new variant of the strategic classification problem: a principal reveals a classifier, and n agents report their (possibly manipulated) features to be classified. Motivated by real-world applications, our model crucially allows the manipulation of one agent to affect another; that is, it explicitly captures inter-agent externalities. The principal-agent interactions are formally modeled as a Stackelberg game, with the resulting agent manipulation dynamics captured as a simultaneous game. We show that under certain assumptions, the pure Nash Equilibrium of this agent manipulation game is unique and can be efficiently computed. Leveraging this result, PAC learning guarantees are established for the learner: informally, we show that it is possible to learn classifiers that minimize loss on the distribution, even when a random number of agents are manipulating their way to a pure Nash Equilibrium. We also comment on the optimization of such classifiers through gradient-based approaches. This work sets the theoretical foundations for a more realistic analysis of classifiers that are robust against multiple strategic actors interacting in a common environment.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 458
  3. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
  4. 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 126
  5. 2018The Mechanics of n-Player Differentiable Gamescited by 118
  6. 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
  7. 2019Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in Disguisecited by 92
  8. 2018How Do Classifiers Induce Agents To Invest Effort Strategically?cited by 82
  9. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  10. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  11. 2021Strategic Classification Made Practicalcited by 58
  12. 2019On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learningcited by 48
13 more
  1. 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
  2. 2021Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classificationcited by 47
  3. 2020Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanismscited by 46
  4. 2022Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned Incentivescited by 34
  5. 2021Strategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal Relationships From Strategic Responsescited by 32
  6. 2023Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shiftscited by 30
  7. 2018Strategyproof Linear Regression in High Dimensionscited by 22
  8. 2022Strategic Classification with Graph Neural Networkscited by 14
  9. 2024Non-linear Welfare-Aware Strategic Learningcited by 12
  10. 2020Towards Data Auctions with Externalitiescited by 9
  11. 2022Equalizing Credit Opportunity in Algorithms: Aligning Algorithmic Fairness Research with U.S. Fair Lending Regulationcited by 9
  12. 2023Equilibrium of Data Markets with Externalitycited by 3
  13. 2020The Effect of Strategic Noise in Linear Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

7 papers.