mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoning

arXiv 2010.00763 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2020cs.AI cs.CV cs.LGcited by 63

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 26 in LLM reasoning, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans have an inherent ability to learn novel concepts from only a few samples and generalize these concepts to different situations. Even though today's machine learning models excel with a plethora of training data on standard recognition tasks, a considerable gap exists between machine-level pattern recognition and human-level concept learning. To narrow this gap, the Bongard problems (BPs) were introduced as an inspirational challenge for visual cognition in intelligent systems. Despite new advances in representation learning and learning to learn, BPs remain a daunting challenge for modern AI. Inspired by the original one hundred BPs, we propose a new benchmark Bongard-LOGO for human-level concept learning and reasoning. We develop a program-guided generation technique to produce a large set of human-interpretable visual cognition problems in action-oriented LOGO language. Our benchmark captures three core properties of human cognition: 1) context-dependent perception, in which the same object may have disparate interpretations given different contexts; 2) analogy-making perception, in which some meaningful concepts are traded off for other meaningful concepts; and 3) perception with a few samples but infinite vocabulary. In experiments, we show that the state-of-the-art deep learning methods perform substantially worse than human subjects, implying that they fail to capture core human cognition properties. Finally, we discuss research directions towards a general architecture for visual reasoning to tackle this benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 63 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 13; 2023: 11; 2024: 14; 2025: 8; 2026: 10.

63 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  2. 2022EgoTaskQA: Understanding Human Tasks in Egocentric Videoscited by 112
  3. 2022Unveiling Transformers with LEGO: a synthetic reasoning taskcited by 105
  4. 2021Abstraction and Analogy-Making in Artificial Intelligencecited by 103
  5. 2023The ConceptARC Benchmark: Evaluating Understanding and Generalization in the ARC Domaincited by 97
  6. 2022A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 43
  7. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Abstract Visual Reasoning: A Survey on Raven's Progressive Matricescited by 37
  8. 2022Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object Interactionscited by 34
  9. 2022A Review of Emerging Research Directions in Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 33
  10. 2024Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 32
  11. 2024MARVEL: Multidimensional Abstraction and Reasoning through Visual Evaluation and Learningcited by 30
  12. 2021Pointer Value Retrieval: A new benchmark for understanding the limits of neural network generalizationcited by 29
38 more
  1. 2025MM-IQ: Benchmarking Human-Like Abstraction and Reasoning in Multimodal Modelscited by 28
  2. 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 26
  3. 2022Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer than Second Graders?cited by 24
  4. 2021ReaSCAN: Compositional Reasoning in Language Groundingcited by 19
  5. 2023Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real Worldcited by 18
  6. 2023MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertaintycited by 17
  7. 2024Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?cited by 16
  8. 2022RelViT: Concept-guided Vision Transformer for Visual Relational Reasoningcited by 14
  9. 2021Tracking Without Re-recognition in Humans and Machinescited by 12
  10. 2025Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMscited by 12
  11. 2025Towards Visual Discrimination and Reasoning of Real-World Physical Dynamics: Physics-Grounded Anomaly Detectioncited by 9
  12. 2023V-LoL: A Diagnostic Dataset for Visual Logical Learningcited by 8
  13. 2022Multi-Viewpoint and Multi-Evaluation with Felicitous Inductive Bias Boost Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 7
  14. 2025Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard Problemscited by 7
  15. 2022Geoclidean: Few-Shot Generalization in Euclidean Geometrycited by 6
  16. 2023BDC-Adapter: Brownian Distance Covariance for Better Vision-Language Reasoningcited by 6
  17. 2023Imagine the Unseen World: A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Visual World Modelscited by 6
  18. 2023One Self-Configurable Model to Solve Many Abstract Visual Reasoning Problemscited by 6
  19. 2021KANDINSKYPatterns -- An experimental exploration environment for Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligencecited by 5
  20. 2024The KANDY Benchmark: Incremental Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning with Kandinsky Patternscited by 5
  21. 2024COLUMBUS: Evaluating COgnitive Lateral Understanding through Multiple-choice reBUSescited by 5
  22. 2025A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMscited by 5
  23. 2025Beyond Perception: Evaluating Abstract Visual Reasoning through Multi-Stage Taskcited by 5
  24. 2025Your Reasoning Benchmark May Not Test Reasoning: Revealing Perception Bottleneck in Abstract Reasoning Benchmarkscited by 5
  25. 2022Towards a Solution to Bongard Problems: A Causal Approachcited by 4
  26. 2023Towards Generalization in Subitizing with Neuro-Symbolic Loss using Holographic Reduced Representationscited by 4
  27. 2024A-I-RAVEN and I-RAVEN-Mesh: Two New Benchmarks for Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 4
  28. 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoningcited by 4
  29. 2024TurtleBench: A Visual Programming Benchmark in Turtle Geometrycited by 4
  30. 2026Toward Cognitive Supersensing in Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 4
  31. 2023Support-Set Context Matters for Bongard Problemscited by 3
  32. 2024Tracking objects that change in appearance with phase synchronycited by 3
  33. 2026Can AI Understand the Language of Origami?cited by 3
  34. 2021Flexible Compositional Learning of Structured Visual Conceptscited by 2
  35. 2021Do You See What I See? Capabilities and Limits of Automated Multimedia Content Analysiscited by 2
  36. 2024Triple-CFN: Separating Concepts and Features Enhances Machine Abstract Reasoning Abilitycited by 2
  37. 2024Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machinescited by 2
  38. 2026DiG-bench: Discovery in Gamescited by 2

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)