Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual reasoning, as a prominent research area, plays a crucial role in AI by facilitating concept formation and interaction with the world. However, current works are usually carried out separately on small datasets thus lacking generalization ability. Through rigorous evaluation of diverse benchmarks, we demonstrate the shortcomings of existing ad-hoc methods in achieving cross-domain reasoning and their tendency to data bias fitting. In this paper, we revisit visual reasoning with a two-stage perspective: (1) symbolization and (2) logical reasoning given symbols or their representations. We find that the reasoning stage is better at generalization than symbolization. Thus, it is more efficient to implement symbolization via separated encoders for different data domains while using a shared reasoner. Given our findings, we establish design principles for visual reasoning frameworks following the separated symbolization and shared reasoning. The proposed two-stage framework achieves impressive generalization ability on various visual reasoning tasks, including puzzles, physical prediction, and visual question answering (VQA), encompassing both 2D and 3D modalities. We believe our insights will pave the way for generalizable visual reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 49 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.
Builds on
49 of 64 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Symbol-LLM: Leverage Language Models for Symbolic System in Visual Human Activity Reasoning29 Nov
- 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning14 Mar
- 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training18 Nov
- 2022A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoning11 Jun
- 2022Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object Interactions27 May
Other references · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
32 more
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
- 2023MiniGPT-v2: large language model as a unified interface for vision-language multi-task learningcited by 617
- 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 536
- 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 2023MultiModal-GPT: A Vision and Language Model for Dialogue with Humanscited by 255
- 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
- 2023LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examplescited by 177
- 2023MMICL: Empowering Vision-language Model with Multi-Modal In-Context Learningcited by 171
- 2020In Defense of Grid Features for Visual Question Answeringcited by 155
- 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
- 2019CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamicscited by 80
- 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
- 2021A Survey on Neural-symbolic Learning Systemscited by 39
- 2022Is Neuro-Symbolic AI Meeting its Promise in Natural Language Processing? A Structured Reviewcited by 37
- 2021PTR: A Benchmark for Part-based Conceptual, Relational, and Physical Reasoningcited by 34
- 2023Can Large Language Models Play Text Games Well? Current State-of-the-Art and Open Questionscited by 30
- 2022HAKE: A Knowledge Engine Foundation for Human Activity Understandingcited by 28
- 2021CausalCity: Complex Simulations with Agency for Causal Discovery and Reasoningcited by 23
- 2022Filtered-CoPhy: Unsupervised Learning of Counterfactual Physics in Pixel Spacecited by 14
- 2022Beyond Object Recognition: A New Benchmark towards Object Concept Learningcited by 11
- 2021SPACE: A Simulator for Physical Interactions and Causal Learning in 3D Environmentscited by 9
- 2021Recurrent Vision Transformer for Solving Visual Reasoning Problemscited by 9
- 2021PIP: Physical Interaction Prediction via Mental Simulation with Span Selectioncited by 8
- 2022A Neural-Symbolic Approach to Natural Language Understandingcited by 8
- 2021Supervising the Transfer of Reasoning Patterns in VQAcited by 7
- 2020Neural-Symbolic Relational Reasoning on Graph Models: Effective Link Inference and Computation from Knowledge Basescited by 3
- 2023HADA: A Graph-based Amalgamation Framework in Image-text Retrievalcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 26
- 2024Design2GarmentCode: Turning Design Concepts to Tangible Garments Through Program Synthesiscited by 17
- 2025IPR-1: Interactive Physical Reasonercited by 2
- 2026Efficient RGB-D Scene Understanding via Multi-task Adaptive Learning and Cross-dimensional Feature Guidancecited by 0
- 2026Efficient RGB-D Scene Understanding via Multi-task Adaptive Learning and Cross-dimensional Feature Guidance8 Mar 2026
- 2025IPR-1: Interactive Physical Reasoner19 Nov 2025
- 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning24 Aug 2025
- 2024Design2GarmentCode: Turning Design Concepts to Tangible Garments Through Program Synthesis11 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Vero: An Open RL Recipe for General Visual Reasoning
- 2024From the Least to the Most: Building a Plug-and-Play Visual Reasoner via Data Synthesis
- 2026Reasoning or Pattern Matching? Probing Large Vision-Language Models with Visual Puzzles
- 2025Diagnosing Visual Reasoning: Challenges, Insights, and a Path Forward
- 2026Learning Adaptive Reasoning Paths for Efficient Visual Reasoning
- 2026VIEW2SPACE: Studying Multi-View Visual Reasoning from Sparse Observations
- 2024Beyond Embeddings: The Promise of Visual Table in Visual Reasoning
- 2022Towards Unsupervised Visual Reasoning: Do Off-The-Shelf Features Know How to Reason?