mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Support-Set Context Matters for Bongard Problems

arXiv 2309.03468 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current machine learning methods struggle to solve Bongard problems, which are a type of IQ test that requires deriving an abstract "concept" from a set of positive and negative "support" images, and then classifying whether or not a new query image depicts the key concept. On Bongard-HOI, a benchmark for natural-image Bongard problems, most existing methods have reached at best 69% accuracy (where chance is 50%). Low accuracy is often attributed to neural nets' lack of ability to find human-like symbolic rules. In this work, we point out that many existing methods are forfeiting accuracy due to a much simpler problem: they do not adapt image features given information contained in the support set as a whole, and rely instead on information extracted from individual supports. This is a critical issue, because the "key concept" in a typical Bongard problem can often only be distinguished using multiple positives and multiple negatives. We explore simple methods to incorporate this context and show substantial gains over prior works, leading to new state-of-the-art accuracy on Bongard-LOGO (75.3%) and Bongard-HOI (76.4%) compared to methods with equivalent vision backbone architectures and strong performance on the original Bongard problem set (60.8%).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

32 of 62 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  6. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  9. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  10. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  11. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  12. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
20 more
  1. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  2. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  3. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  4. 2019Meta-Learning with Differentiable Convex Optimizationcited by 461
  5. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  6. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  7. 2018Few-Shot Learning via Embedding Adaptation with Set-to-Set Functionscited by 293
  8. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 230
  9. 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
  10. 2019SimpleShot: Revisiting Nearest-Neighbor Classification for Few-Shot Learningcited by 194
  11. 2020Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learningcited by 179
  12. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
  13. 2021End-to-End Human Object Interaction Detection with HOI Transformercited by 134
  14. 2022Pushing the Limits of Simple Pipelines for Few-Shot Learning: External Data and Fine-Tuning Make a Differencecited by 123
  15. 2021Abstraction and Analogy-Making in Artificial Intelligencecited by 103
  16. 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
  17. 2020TaskNorm: Rethinking Batch Normalization for Meta-Learningcited by 50
  18. 2018Solving Bongard Problems with a Visual Language and Pragmatic Reasoningcited by 21
  19. 2021Using Program Synthesis and Inductive Logic Programming to solve Bongard Problemscited by 6
  20. 2023BDC-Adapter: Brownian Distance Covariance for Better Vision-Language Reasoningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.