Tracking objects that change in appearance with phase synchrony
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objects we encounter often change appearance as we interact with them. Changes in illumination (shadows), object pose, or the movement of non-rigid objects can drastically alter available image features. How do biological visual systems track objects as they change? One plausible mechanism involves attentional mechanisms for reasoning about the locations of objects independently of their appearances -- a capability that prominent neuroscience theories have associated with computing through neural synchrony. Here, we describe a novel deep learning circuit that can learn to precisely control attention to features separately from their location in the world through neural synchrony: the complex-valued recurrent neural network (CV-RNN). Next, we compare object tracking in humans, the CV-RNN, and other deep neural networks (DNNs), using FeatureTracker: a large-scale challenge that asks observers to track objects as their locations and appearances change in precisely controlled ways. While humans effortlessly solved FeatureTracker, state-of-the-art DNNs did not. In contrast, our CV-RNN behaved similarly to humans on the challenge, providing a computational proof-of-concept for the role of phase synchronization as a neural substrate for tracking appearance-morphing objects as they move about.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
26 of 76 references.
References · 26
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
- 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
- 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
- 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 784
- 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 776
- 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 696
14 more
- 2018Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated-recurrent unitscited by 98
- 2023Robust Object Modeling for Visual Trackingcited by 80
- 2020Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistencycited by 77
- 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
- 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
- 2022Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object Discoverycited by 40
- 2013Neuronal Synchrony in Complex-Valued Deep Networkscited by 28
- 2019Disentangling neural mechanisms for perceptual groupingcited by 28
- 2023Performance-optimized deep neural networks are evolving into worse models of inferotemporal visual cortexcited by 18
- 2023Contrastive Training of Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object Discoverycited by 16
- 2021Tracking Without Re-recognition in Humans and Machinescited by 12
- 2016How Deep is the Feature Analysis underlying Rapid Visual Categorization?cited by 7
- 2023Adversarial alignment: Breaking the trade-off between the strength of an attack and its relevance to human perceptioncited by 7
- 2021KuraNet: Systems of Coupled Oscillators that Learn to Synchronizecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.