mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real World

arXiv 2310.10207 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 18

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Bongard-OpenWorld, a new benchmark for evaluating real-world few-shot reasoning for machine vision. It originates from the classical Bongard Problems (BPs): Given two sets of images (positive and negative), the model needs to identify the set that query images belong to by inducing the visual concepts, which is exclusively depicted by images from the positive set. Our benchmark inherits the few-shot concept induction of the original BPs while adding the two novel layers of challenge: 1) open-world free-form concepts, as the visual concepts in Bongard-OpenWorld are unique compositions of terms from an open vocabulary, ranging from object categories to abstract visual attributes and commonsense factual knowledge; 2) real-world images, as opposed to the synthetic diagrams used by many counterparts. In our exploration, Bongard-OpenWorld already imposes a significant challenge to current few-shot reasoning algorithms. We further investigate to which extent the recently introduced Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can solve our task, by directly probing VLMs, and combining VLMs and LLMs in an interactive reasoning scheme. We even conceived a neuro-symbolic reasoning approach that reconciles LLMs & VLMs with logical reasoning to emulate the human problem-solving process for Bongard Problems. However, none of these approaches manage to close the human-machine gap, as the best learner achieves 64% accuracy while human participants easily reach 91%. We hope Bongard-OpenWorld can help us better understand the limitations of current visual intelligence and facilitate future research on visual agents with stronger few-shot visual reasoning capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 43 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2023.

Builds on

43 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object Interactions27 May

Other references · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  7. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  8. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  9. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  10. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  12. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
30 more
  1. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  2. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  5. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  6. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  7. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  8. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  9. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  10. 2022Language-driven Semantic Segmentationcited by 711
  11. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  12. 2019Meta-Learning with Differentiable Convex Optimizationcited by 461
  13. 2020Open-Vocabulary Object Detection Using Captionscited by 427
  14. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  15. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
  16. 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
  17. 2022SQA3D: Situated Question Answering in 3D Scenescited by 303
  18. 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
  19. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
  20. 2022F-VLM: Open-Vocabulary Object Detection upon Frozen Vision and Language Modelscited by 149
  21. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  22. 2019Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification Using Conditional Neural Adaptive Processescited by 131
  23. 2019Improved Few-Shot Visual Classificationcited by 114
  24. 2023ChatGPT Asks, BLIP-2 Answers: Automatic Questioning Towards Enriched Visual Descriptionscited by 86
  25. 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
  26. 2019HAKE: Human Activity Knowledge Enginecited by 32
  27. 2019V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive Matricescited by 24
  28. 2021HALMA: Humanlike Abstraction Learning Meets Affordance in Rapid Problem Solvingcited by 15
  29. 2022RelViT: Concept-guided Vision Transformer for Visual Relational Reasoningcited by 14
  30. 2020Probing Few-Shot Generalization with Attributescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025LongViTU: Instruction Tuning for Long-Form Video Understandingcited by 12
  2. 2025Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMscited by 12
  3. 2025OASIS: Online Sample Selection for Continual Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 8
  4. 2024Budgeted Online Continual Learning by Adaptive Layer Freezing and Frequency-based Samplingcited by 7
  5. 2025Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard Problemscited by 7
  6. 2025Synthesizing Visual Concepts as Vision-Language Programscited by 6
  7. 2024Adaptive Self-Supervised Learning Strategies for Dynamic On-Device LLM Personalizationcited by 5
  8. 2025A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMscited by 5
  9. 2026Toward Cognitive Supersensing in Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 4
  10. 2024Defeasible Visual Entailment: Benchmark, Evaluator, and Reward-Driven Optimizationcited by 3
  11. 2025VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMscited by 3
  12. 2026Bongards at the Boundary of Perception and Reasoning: Programs or Language?cited by 1
6 more
  1. 2026Playing ZendoWorld: Challenging AI Agents on Active Visual Concept Inductioncited by 1
  2. 2024GlyphPattern: An Abstract Pattern Recognition Benchmark for Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  3. 2025Beyond the Linear Separability Ceiling: Aligning Representations in VLMscited by 0
  4. 2026Less Data, Faster Convergence: Goal-Driven Data Optimization for Multimodal Instruction Tuningcited by 0
  5. 2026COCOLogic-V2: Identifying Logical Inconsistencies via Truly Hard-Negativescited by 0
  6. 2026Intuition vectorscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?
  2. 2024Reasoning Limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models. A Case Study of Bongard Problems
  3. 2026Grid2Matrix: Revealing Digital Agnosia in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Reasoning in Computer Vision: Taxonomy, Models, Tasks, and Methodologies
  5. 2024Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
  6. 2024Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysis
  7. 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
  8. 2026Symbolic Grounding Reveals Representational Bottlenecks in Abstract Visual Reasoning