mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PaintBench: Deterministic Evaluation of Precise Visual Editing

arXiv 2606.00188 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.GR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While current multimodal models are proficient at open-ended visual editing, executing precise single-answer edits remains an important obstacle. To probe this challenge, we introduce PaintBench, a dynamically scalable benchmark targeting 20 fundamental precise visual editing operations across four categories: geometric transformation, structural manipulation, color change, and symbolic reasoning. Procedural generation with configurable complexity enables an effectively infinite, contamination-resistant evaluation suite, and deterministic pixel-level evaluation eliminates reliance on bias-prone judge models. Across 11 image editing models, we find overall low performance, with the current highest-performing industry leader scoring only 17.1% (mIoU). Task decomposition reveals especially challenging operation types (geometric transformation, most structural manipulation, formula-based color change) and model-specific specializations. Fine-grained benchmark diagnostics further show performance degradations induced by scene variations in object count, background complexity, color scheme, and edit-region size. To test generalization of PaintBench scores to applied task performance, we create a procedural, deterministic evaluation for data visualization editing (TinyGrafixBench) and find strong linear correlation with PaintBench scores (R2 = 0.91, p < 0.001). Altogether, PaintBench provides a rigorous foundation for measuring and driving progress in precise multimodal visual editing.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

34 of 50 references.

References · 34

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,611
  5. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  6. 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
  7. 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 1,006
  8. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
  9. 2024Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Modelscited by 927
  10. 2025Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretrainingcited by 897
  11. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 838
  12. 2024Emu3: Next-Token Prediction is All You Needcited by 781
22 more
  1. 2023MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editingcited by 624
  2. 2024Transfusion: Predict the Next Token and Diffuse Images with One Multi-Modal Modelcited by 483
  3. 2025ImgEdit: A Unified Image Editing Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 231
  4. 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 226
  5. 2024MetaMorph: Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Instruction Tuningcited by 206
  6. 2025HunyuanImage 3.0 Technical Reportcited by 149
  7. 2025LongCat-Image Technical Reportcited by 100
  8. 2025Envisioning Beyond the Pixels: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Visual Editingcited by 99
  9. 2025Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 85
  10. 2025KRIS-Bench: Benchmarking Next-Level Intelligent Image Editing Modelscited by 71
  11. 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
  12. 2024I2EBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Image Editingcited by 63
  13. 2023EditVal: Benchmarking Diffusion Based Text-Guided Image Editing Methodscited by 54
  14. 2025GenEval 2: Addressing Benchmark Drift in Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 52
  15. 2026Image Generators are Generalist Vision Learnerscited by 43
  16. 2026Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretrainingcited by 37
  17. 2026A Very Big Video Reasoning Suitecited by 34
  18. 2025textttComplex-Edit: CoT-Like Instruction Generation for Complexity-Controllable Image Editing Benchmarkcited by 27
  19. 2025UniREditBench: A Unified Reasoning-based Image Editing Benchmarkcited by 25
  20. 2025Can World Simulators Reason? Gen-ViRe: A Generative Visual Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 19
  21. 2026Human-Aligned MLLM Judges for Fine-Grained Image Editing Evaluation: A Benchmark, Framework, and Analysiscited by 8
  22. 2026VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026UniEditBench: A Unified and Cost-Effective Benchmark for Image and Video Editing via Distilled MLLMs
  2. 2025ComplexBench-Edit: Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Driven Image Editing via Compositional Dependencies
  3. 2025CompBench: Benchmarking Complex Instruction-guided Image Editing
  4. 2026Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing
  5. 2026GEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image Editing
  6. 2026DLEBench: Evaluating Small-scale Object Editing Ability for Instruction-based Image Editing Model
  7. 2026Edit2TikZ: A Comprehensive and Challenging Benchmark for Scientific Figure Editing with TikZ
  8. 2026ImagenWorld: Stress-Testing Image Generation Models with Explainable Human Evaluation on Open-ended Real-World Tasks