Geoclidean: Few-Shot Generalization in Euclidean Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Euclidean geometry is among the earliest forms of mathematical thinking. While the geometric primitives underlying its constructions, such as perfect lines and circles, do not often occur in the natural world, humans rarely struggle to perceive and reason with them. Will computer vision models trained on natural images show the same sensitivity to Euclidean geometry? Here we explore these questions by studying few-shot generalization in the universe of Euclidean geometry constructions. We introduce Geoclidean, a domain-specific language for Euclidean geometry, and use it to generate two datasets of geometric concept learning tasks for benchmarking generalization judgements of humans and machines. We find that humans are indeed sensitive to Euclidean geometry and generalize strongly from a few visual examples of a geometric concept. In contrast, low-level and high-level visual features from standard computer vision models pretrained on natural images do not support correct generalization. Thus Geoclidean represents a novel few-shot generalization benchmark for geometric concept learning, where the performance of humans and of AI models diverge. The Geoclidean framework and dataset are publicly available for download.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2022.
Builds on
32 of 63 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2018PartNet: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained and Hierarchical Part-level 3D Object Understandingcited by 521
- 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
20 more
- 2021Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 376
- 2018ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset For Geometric Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
- 2018FewRel: A Large-Scale Supervised Few-Shot Relation Classification Dataset with State-of-the-Art Evaluationcited by 254
- 2020ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulationcited by 249
- 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
- 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
- 2021Few-NERD: A Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 150
- 2017CSGNet: Neural Shape Parser for Constructive Solid Geometrycited by 106
- 2017Learning to Infer Graphics Programs from Hand-Drawn Imagescited by 73
- 2020SketchGraphs: A Large-Scale Dataset for Modeling Relational Geometry in Computer-Aided Designcited by 72
- 2020Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoningcited by 63
- 2019Learning to Make Analogies by Contrasting Abstract Relational Structurecited by 53
- 2019Structured agents for physical constructioncited by 50
- 2021ORBIT: A Real-World Few-Shot Dataset for Teachable Object Recognitioncited by 29
- 2018Solving Bongard Problems with a Visual Language and Pragmatic Reasoningcited by 21
- 2022Plane Geometry Diagram Parsingcited by 20
- 2020Machine Number Sense: A Dataset of Visual Arithmetic Problems for Abstract and Relational Reasoningcited by 18
- 2022Break and Make: Interactive Structural Understanding Using LEGO Brickscited by 8
- 2021Learning from the Tangram to Solve Mini Visual Taskscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 26
- 2023MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertaintycited by 17
- 2023Learning Geometry-aware Representations by Sketchingcited by 5
- 2024Human-Like Geometric Abstraction in Large Pre-trained Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2025Visual serial processing deficits explain divergences in human and VLM reasoningcited by 3
- 2025Computer Vision Models Show Human-Like Sensitivity to Geometric and Topological Conceptscited by 2
- 2025Visual serial processing deficits explain divergences in human and VLM reasoning29 Sep 2025
- 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning24 Aug 2025
- 2025Computer Vision Models Show Human-Like Sensitivity to Geometric and Topological Concepts19 May 2025
- 2024Human-Like Geometric Abstraction in Large Pre-trained Neural Networks6 Feb 2024
- 2023MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertainty1 Jun 2023
- 2023Learning Geometry-aware Representations by Sketching17 Apr 2023