mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondences

arXiv 1912.05524 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2019cs.CVcited by 139

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Establishing dense correspondences between a pair of images is an important and general problem, covering geometric matching, optical flow and semantic correspondences. While these applications share fundamental challenges, such as large displacements, pixel-accuracy, and appearance changes, they are currently addressed with specialized network architectures, designed for only one particular task. This severely limits the generalization capabilities of such networks to new scenarios, where e.g. robustness to larger displacements or higher accuracy is required. In this work, we propose a universal network architecture that is directly applicable to all the aforementioned dense correspondence problems. We achieve both high accuracy and robustness to large displacements by investigating the combined use of global and local correlation layers. We further propose an adaptive resolution strategy, allowing our network to operate on virtually any input image resolution. The proposed GLU-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance for geometric and semantic matching as well as optical flow, when using the same network and weights. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/PruneTruong/GLU-Net.

Key facts. Cited by 139 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 22; 2022: 28; 2023: 26; 2024: 25; 2025: 23; 2026: 15.

139 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 979
  2. 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 965
  3. 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 326
  4. 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 298
  5. 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 296
  6. 2021Pixel-Perfect Structure-from-Motion with Featuremetric Refinementcited by 200
  7. 2022SPARF: Neural Radiance Fields from Sparse and Noisy Posescited by 195
  8. 2021Hypercorrelation Squeeze for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 193
  9. 2023Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 191
  10. 2021COTR: Correspondence Transformer for Matching Across Imagescited by 182
  11. 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 175
  12. 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 170
38 more
  1. 2023Unsupervised Semantic Correspondence Using Stable Diffusioncited by 120
  2. 2022Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 114
  3. 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
  4. 2022RelPose: Predicting Probabilistic Relative Rotation for Single Objects in the Wildcited by 102
  5. 2022NeRF-Supervision: Learning Dense Object Descriptors from Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 86
  6. 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 85
  7. 2021PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Networkcited by 80
  8. 2024Local All-Pair Correspondence for Point Trackingcited by 78
  9. 2021CATs: Cost Aggregation Transformers for Visual Correspondencecited by 77
  10. 2024DreamMatcher: Appearance Matching Self-Attention for Semantically-Consistent Text-to-Image Personalizationcited by 60
  11. 2022CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformerscited by 53
  12. 2024XoFTR: Cross-modal Feature Matching Transformercited by 46
  13. 2025Dens3R: A Foundation Model for 3D Geometry Predictioncited by 44
  14. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networkscited by 43
  15. 2021Warp Consistency for Unsupervised Learning of Dense Correspondencescited by 42
  16. 2021Deep Lucas-Kanade Homography for Multimodal Image Alignmentcited by 38
  17. 2024DeDoDe v2: Analyzing and Improving the DeDoDe Keypoint Detectorcited by 38
  18. 2025UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flowcited by 35
  19. 2023PATS: Patch Area Transportation with Subdivision for Local Feature Matchingcited by 33
  20. 2023Rethinking Optical Flow from Geometric Matching Consistent Perspectivecited by 33
  21. 2021Multi-scale Matching Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  22. 2022SGUIE-Net: Semantic Attention Guided Underwater Image Enhancement with Multi-Scale Perceptioncited by 32
  23. 2022Neural Matching Fields: Implicit Representation of Matching Fields for Visual Correspondencecited by 32
  24. 2022Refign: Align and Refine for Adaptation of Semantic Segmentation to Adverse Conditionscited by 31
  25. 2022Learning Semantic Correspondence with Sparse Annotationscited by 31
  26. 2024Reconstructing People, Places, and Camerascited by 31
  27. 2021Deep Matching Prior: Test-Time Optimization for Dense Correspondencecited by 30
  28. 2022Probabilistic Warp Consistency for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Correspondencescited by 30
  29. 2024Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimatorscited by 30
  30. 2025Emergent Temporal Correspondences from Video Diffusion Transformerscited by 30
  31. 2022TransforMatcher: Match-to-Match Attention for Semantic Correspondencecited by 29
  32. 2023PMatch: Paired Masked Image Modeling for Dense Geometric Matchingcited by 29
  33. 2022Self-Supervised Equivariant Learning for Oriented Keypoint Detectioncited by 26
  34. 2024Local Feature Matching Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 26
  35. 2022DynaST: Dynamic Sparse Transformer for Exemplar-Guided Image Generationcited by 24
  36. 2023Adaptive Spot-Guided Transformer for Consistent Local Feature Matchingcited by 22
  37. 2022MSANet: Multi-Similarity and Attention Guidance for Boosting Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 21
  38. 2023Diffusion Model for Dense Matchingcited by 21

50 most cited of 139 All 139 (JSON)