REDI-Match: Rotation-Equivariant Distillation for Efficient and Robust Dense Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) have significantly advanced dense feature matching, yet severe in-plane rotation remains a critical challenge. Existing solutions face a fundamental dilemma: data-driven methods require inefficient parameter scaling to implicitly learn rotations, whereas strictly equivariant networks lack the semantic capacity of modern VFMs. Consequently, current frameworks typically freeze VFMs and shift the entire burden of rotation generalization to the downstream decoder. To break this architectural bottleneck, we propose REDI-Match, an efficient framework driven by a novel Rotation-Equivariant Distillation (REDI) paradigm. Instead of relying on rotation data augmentation to establish rotational correspondences, REDI distills the non-equivariant semantic representations of a VFM into a lightweight, strictly rotation-equivariant encoder, leveraging an equivariant geometric architecture to constrain robust high-dimensional semantics. To fully exploit these features, we equip the decoder with an entropy-driven spatial alignment module. By evaluating discrete rotation hypotheses, this mechanism explicitly locks onto the canonical coordinate system, eliminating global ambiguity before continuous refinement. Extensive experiments demonstrate that REDI-Match establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) across multiple benchmarks. Notably, it achieves a 13.89% absolute pose accuracy improvement on the highly challenging SatAst dataset while operating 1.9x faster than the current SOTA (RoMa v2), enabling real-time inference (~41 FPS) on a single RTX 4090 GPU. Code: https://github.com/YinjiGe/REDI-Match.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.
Builds on
45 of 51 references.
References · 45
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,653
- 2025VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 1,539
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
- 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 889
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
- 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
33 more
- 2019Similarity-Preserving Knowledge Distillationcited by 516
- 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 312
- 2016Steerable CNNscited by 305
- 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
- 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 225
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 177
- 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 171
- 2019Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Networkcited by 149
- 2019GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondencescited by 139
- 2020Patch2Pix: Epipolar-Guided Pixel-Level Correspondencescited by 129
- 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
- 2023ALIKED: A Lighter Keypoint and Descriptor Extraction Network via Deformable Transformationcited by 121
- 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 120
- 2023GlueStick: Robust Image Matching by Sticking Points and Lines Togethercited by 66
- 2023DeDoDe: Detect, Don't Describe -- Describe, Don't Detect for Local Feature Matchingcited by 63
- 2025RoMa v2: Harder Better Faster Denser Feature Matchingcited by 51
- 2024DeDoDe v2: Analyzing and Improving the DeDoDe Keypoint Detectorcited by 39
- 2025AerialMegaDepth: Learning Aerial-Ground Reconstruction and View Synthesiscited by 39
- 2025UFM: A Simple Path towards Unified Dense Correspondence with Flowcited by 36
- 2022TopicFM: Robust and Interpretable Topic-Assisted Feature Matchingcited by 32
- 2023PMatch: Paired Masked Image Modeling for Dense Geometric Matchingcited by 29
- 2022A case for using rotation invariant features in state of the art feature matcherscited by 27
- 2023Learning Rotation-Equivariant Features for Visual Correspondencecited by 23
- 2023Adaptive Spot-Guided Transformer for Consistent Local Feature Matchingcited by 22
- 2023Steerers: A framework for rotation equivariant keypoint descriptorscited by 21
- 2023Improving Transformer-based Image Matching by Cascaded Capturing Spatially Informative Keypointscited by 15
- 2025RDD: Robust Feature Detector and Descriptor using Deformable Transformercited by 13
- 2025CoMatch: Dynamic Covisibility-Aware Transformer for Bilateral Subpixel-Level Semi-Dense Image Matchingcited by 12
- 2025LiftFeat: 3D Geometry-Aware Local Feature Matchingcited by 12
- 2026LoMa: Local Feature Matching Revisitedcited by 11
- 2023Using and Abusing Equivariancecited by 4
- 2026Who Handles Orientation? Investigating Invariance in Feature Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.