mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanations

arXiv 1911.06473 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2019cs.AIcited by 111

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning black boxes are increasingly being deployed in critical domains such as healthcare and criminal justice, there has been a growing emphasis on developing techniques for explaining these black boxes in a human interpretable manner. It has recently become apparent that a high-fidelity explanation of a black box ML model may not accurately reflect the biases in the black box. As a consequence, explanations have the potential to mislead human users into trusting a problematic black box. In this work, we rigorously explore the notion of misleading explanations and how they influence user trust in black-box models. More specifically, we propose a novel theoretical framework for understanding and generating misleading explanations, and carry out a user study with domain experts to demonstrate how these explanations can be used to mislead users. Our work is the first to empirically establish how user trust in black box models can be manipulated via misleading explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 111 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 25; 2022: 29; 2023: 18; 2024: 15; 2025: 13; 2026: 11.

111 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  2. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
  3. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
  4. 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
  5. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  6. 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
  7. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  8. 2022Concept-level Debugging of Part-Prototype Networkscited by 52
  9. 2022Logic-Based Explainability in Machine Learningcited by 48
  10. 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A surveycited by 48
  11. 2021Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanationscited by 47
  12. 2021Local Explanations via Necessity and Sufficiency: Unifying Theory and Practicecited by 45
38 more
  1. 2022Towards Formal XAI: Formally Approximate Minimal Explanations of Neural Networkscited by 42
  2. 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
  3. 2021SAT-Based Rigorous Explanations for Decision Listscited by 40
  4. 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40
  5. 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 40
  6. 2021On Efficiently Explaining Graph-Based Classifierscited by 37
  7. 2021GCExplainer: Human-in-the-Loop Concept-based Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 35
  8. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspectivecited by 33
  9. 2022Scalable Interpretability via Polynomialscited by 25
  10. 2022Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 25
  11. 2022Robust Explanation Constraints for Neural Networkscited by 24
  12. 2023Dear XAI Community, We Need to Talk! Fundamental Misconceptions in Current XAI Researchcited by 22
  13. 2021Characterizing the risk of fairwashingcited by 21
  14. 2023A Systematic Review on Fostering Appropriate Trust in Human-AI Interactioncited by 21
  15. 2024LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaborationcited by 21
  16. 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutionscited by 18
  17. 2022On Computing Probabilistic Abductive Explanationscited by 18
  18. 2021Connecting Interpretability and Robustness in Decision Trees through Separationcited by 16
  19. 2021Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoningcited by 16
  20. 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
  21. 2022Inferring Sensitive Attributes from Model Explanationscited by 15
  22. 2023Impact Of Explainable AI On Cognitive Load: Insights From An Empirical Studycited by 15
  23. 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-makingcited by 14
  24. 2021Efficient Explanations With Relevant Setscited by 12
  25. 2022Algorithmic Assistance with Recommendation-Dependent Preferencescited by 12
  26. 2021On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisionscited by 11
  27. 2023On Formal Feature Attribution and Its Approximationcited by 11
  28. 2021Detecting Spurious Correlations with Sanity Tests for Artificial Intelligence Guided Radiology Systemscited by 10
  29. 2021When and How to Fool Explainable Models (and Humans) with Adversarial Examplescited by 10
  30. 2022A Psychological Theory of Explainabilitycited by 10
  31. 2023Discriminative Feature Attributions: Bridging Post Hoc Explainability and Inherent Interpretabilitycited by 10
  32. 2024Efficient Exploration of the Rashomon Set of Rule Set Modelscited by 10
  33. 2024Utilizing Human Behavior Modeling to Manipulate Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision Making: The Good, the Bad, and the Scarycited by 10
  34. 2022A Human-Centric Take on Model Monitoringcited by 9
  35. 2022Causality-Inspired Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 9
  36. 2024The Double-Edged Sword of Behavioral Responses in Strategic Classification: Theory and User Studiescited by 9
  37. 2024Don't be Fooled: The Misinformation Effect of Explanations in Human-AI Collaborationcited by 8
  38. 2021What will it take to generate fairness-preserving explanations?cited by 7

50 most cited of 111 All 111 (JSON)