mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Why do explanations fail? A typology and discussion on failures in XAI

arXiv 2405.13474 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Machine Learning models achieve unprecedented levels of performance, the XAI domain aims at making these models understandable by presenting end-users with intelligible explanations. Yet, some existing XAI approaches fail to meet expectations: several issues have been reported in the literature, generally pointing out either technical limitations or misinterpretations by users. In this paper, we argue that the resulting harms arise from a complex overlap of multiple failures in XAI, which existing ad-hoc studies fail to capture. This work therefore advocates for a holistic perspective, presenting a systematic investigation of limitations of current XAI methods and their impact on the interpretation of explanations. % By distinguishing between system-specific and user-specific failures, we propose a typological framework that helps revealing the nuanced complexities of explanation failures. Leveraging this typology, we discuss some research directions to help practitioners better understand the limitations of XAI systems and enhance the quality of ML explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 143 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

68 of 143 references.

References · 68

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  5. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  7. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  8. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  9. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  10. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  11. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  12. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
38 more
  1. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  2. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  3. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  4. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  5. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
  6. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  7. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  8. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  9. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  10. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
  11. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
  12. 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
  13. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  14. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 145
  15. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  16. 2020Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligencecited by 118
  17. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  18. 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
  19. 2020Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIMEcited by 89
  20. 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
  21. 2017Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciencescited by 85
  22. 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
  23. 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
  24. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
  25. 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 75
  26. 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
  27. 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
  28. 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
  29. 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
  30. 2022Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contextscited by 53
  31. 2021S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model Explanationcited by 52
  32. 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 45
  33. 2019ALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretabilitycited by 41
  34. 2023Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systemscited by 41
  35. 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 39
  36. 2021Order in the Court: Explainable AI Methods Prone to Disagreementcited by 36
  37. 2018Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablitycited by 33
  38. 2019Issues with post-hoc counterfactual explanations: a discussioncited by 30

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.