Why do explanations fail? A typology and discussion on failures in XAI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Machine Learning models achieve unprecedented levels of performance, the XAI domain aims at making these models understandable by presenting end-users with intelligible explanations. Yet, some existing XAI approaches fail to meet expectations: several issues have been reported in the literature, generally pointing out either technical limitations or misinterpretations by users. In this paper, we argue that the resulting harms arise from a complex overlap of multiple failures in XAI, which existing ad-hoc studies fail to capture. This work therefore advocates for a holistic perspective, presenting a systematic investigation of limitations of current XAI methods and their impact on the interpretation of explanations. % By distinguishing between system-specific and user-specific failures, we propose a typological framework that helps revealing the nuanced complexities of explanation failures. Leveraging this typology, we discuss some research directions to help practitioners better understand the limitations of XAI systems and enhance the quality of ML explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 143 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.
Builds on
68 of 143 references.
References · 68
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
38 more
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
- 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
- 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 145
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2020Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligencecited by 118
- 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
- 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
- 2020Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIMEcited by 89
- 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
- 2017Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciencescited by 85
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
- 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
- 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
- 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 75
- 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
- 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
- 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
- 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
- 2022Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contextscited by 53
- 2021S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model Explanationcited by 52
- 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 45
- 2019ALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretabilitycited by 41
- 2023Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systemscited by 41
- 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 39
- 2021Order in the Court: Explainable AI Methods Prone to Disagreementcited by 36
- 2018Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablitycited by 33
- 2019Issues with post-hoc counterfactual explanations: a discussioncited by 30
50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Transparent Adaptive Learning via Data-Centric Multimodal Explainable AIcited by 1
- 2025Leveraging Generative AI for Human Understanding: Meta-Requirements and Design Principles for Explanatory AI as a new Paradigmcited by 0
- 2025xAI-CV: An Overview of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Computer Visioncited by 0
- 2025Keypoint Counting Classifiers: Turning Vision Transformers into Self-Explainable Models Without Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AIcited by 0
- 2026The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Military Operationscited by 0
- 2026The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Military Operations22 Sep 2026
- 2026Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AI23 Aug 2026
- 2025Keypoint Counting Classifiers: Turning Vision Transformers into Self-Explainable Models Without Training19 Dec 2025
- 2025xAI-CV: An Overview of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Computer Vision23 Sep 2025
- 2025Leveraging Generative AI for Human Understanding: Meta-Requirements and Design Principles for Explanatory AI as a new Paradigm8 Aug 2025
- 2025Transparent Adaptive Learning via Data-Centric Multimodal Explainable AI1 Aug 2025