mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Right Predictions, Misleading Explanations: On the Vulnerability of Vision-Language Model Explanations

arXiv 2605.16651 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Explanation mechanisms are increasingly used to support transparency and trust in vision-language models (VLMs), particularly in settings where model decisions require human oversight. However, the robustness of these explanations remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we investigate whether explanation heatmaps in VLMs, particularly CLIP-based models, faithfully reflect model reasoning under adversarial conditions. We show that explanation maps can be systematically manipulated while preserving the model's original prediction, revealing a disconnect between predictive behavior and explanation faithfulness. To study this vulnerability, we introduce X-Shift, a novel grey-box attack that perturbs patch-level visual representations to redirect explanation heatmaps toward semantically irrelevant regions without altering the predicted output. Unlike conventional adversarial attacks that aim to induce misclassification, X-Shift specifically targets the integrity of the explanation process itself. The attack operates without modifying model parameters and generalizes across multiple CLIP architectures and explanation methods. We evaluate the proposed approach on ImageNet-1k, MS-COCO, and Flickr30K, demonstrating consistent degradation in explanation alignment under imperceptible perturbations while maintaining prediction stability. Furthermore, standard prediction-oriented adversarial attacks fail to reproduce the same explanation-shifting behavior even under substantially larger perturbation budgets. Our findings highlight a fundamental limitation of current explanation mechanisms in VLMs and raise concerns about their use as reliable indicators of model trustworthiness in high-impact applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

29 of 39 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  11. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
  12. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
17 more
  1. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  2. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  3. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  4. 2023Grounding Language Models to Images for Multimodal Inputs and Outputscited by 129
  5. 2021BadEncoder: Backdoor Attacks to Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 120
  6. 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
  7. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  8. 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
  9. 2023A Closer Look at the Explainability of Contrastive Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 95
  10. 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
  11. 2021Exploring Architectural Ingredients of Adversarially Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 73
  12. 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A surveycited by 47
  13. 2022Exploring Visual Interpretability for Contrastive Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 29
  14. 2025X-Transfer Attacks: Towards Super Transferable Adversarial Attacks on CLIPcited by 21
  15. 2024A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selectioncited by 20
  16. 2025Detecting Backdoor Samples in Contrastive Language Image Pretrainingcited by 17
  17. 2024Adversarial Attacks on Data Attributioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Believing without Seeing: Quality Scores for Contextualizing Vision-Language Model Explanations
  2. 2024GIFT: A Framework Towards Global Interpretable Faithful Textual Explanations of Vision Classifiers
  3. 2023Interpreting and Controlling Vision Foundation Models via Text Explanations
  4. 2023From Wrong To Right: A Recursive Approach Towards Vision-Language Explanation
  5. 2026EDCT-Bench: Uncovering Faithfulness Gaps in VLMs via Explanation-Driven Counterfactual Testing
  6. 2025Explanation-Driven Counterfactual Testing for Faithfulness in Vision-Language Model Explanations
  7. 2024DEAL: Disentangle and Localize Concept-level Explanations for VLMs
  8. 2026Logit Lens Supervision for Patch-Level Explanations in Vision-Language Models