mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact Of Explainable AI On Cognitive Load: Insights From An Empirical Study

arXiv 2304.08861 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2023cs.AI cs.HCcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the emerging research field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) claims to address the lack of explainability in high-performance machine learning models, in practice, XAI targets developers rather than actual end-users. Unsurprisingly, end-users are often unwilling to use XAI-based decision support systems. Similarly, there is limited interdisciplinary research on end-users' behavior during XAI explanations usage, rendering it unknown how explanations may impact cognitive load and further affect end-user performance. Therefore, we conducted an empirical study with 271 prospective physicians, measuring their cognitive load, task performance, and task time for distinct implementation-independent XAI explanation types using a COVID-19 use case. We found that these explanation types strongly influence end-users' cognitive load, task performance, and task time. Further, we contextualized a mental efficiency metric, ranking local XAI explanation types best, to provide recommendations for future applications and implications for sociotechnical XAI research.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2023.

Builds on

17 of 85 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  3. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
  4. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
  5. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
  6. 2020Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systemscited by 139
  7. 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
  8. 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
  9. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  10. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  11. 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
  12. 2023Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision supportcited by 66
5 more
  1. 2019A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processingcited by 23
  2. 2022Stop ordering machine learning algorithms by their explainability! A user-centered investigation of performance and explainabilitycited by 21
  3. 2018On Cognitive Preferences and the Plausibility of Rule-based Modelscited by 14
  4. 2021Roadmap of Designing Cognitive Metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 13
  5. 2020Measure Utility, Gain Trust: Practical Advice for XAI Researchercited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: