mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Measuring Perceived Trust in XAI-Assisted Decision-Making by Eliciting a Mental Model

arXiv 2307.11765 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2023cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This empirical study proposes a novel methodology to measure users' perceived trust in an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) model. To do so, users' mental models are elicited using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs). First, we exploit an interpretable Machine Learning (ML) model to classify suspected COVID-19 patients into positive or negative cases. Then, Medical Experts' (MEs) conduct a diagnostic decision-making task based on their knowledge and then prediction and interpretations provided by the XAI model. In order to evaluate the impact of interpretations on perceived trust, explanation satisfaction attributes are rated by MEs through a survey. Then, they are considered as FCM's concepts to determine their influences on each other and, ultimately, on the perceived trust. Moreover, to consider MEs' mental subjectivity, fuzzy linguistic variables are used to determine the strength of influences. After reaching the steady state of FCMs, a quantified value is obtained to measure the perceived trust of each ME. The results show that the quantified values can determine whether MEs trust or distrust the XAI model. We analyze this behavior by comparing the quantified values with MEs' performance in completing diagnostic tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.

Builds on

10 of 41 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  2. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  3. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
  4. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  5. 2019Quantifying Interpretability and Trust in Machine Learning Systemscited by 49
  6. 2020Local and Global Explanations of Agent Behavior: Integrating Strategy Summaries with Saliency Mapscited by 30
  7. 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-makingcited by 14
  8. 2022Are we measuring trust correctly in explainability, interpretability, and transparency research?cited by 11
  9. 2022The Value of Measuring Trust in AI - A Socio-Technical System Perspectivecited by 2
  10. 2023Trust and Reliance in Consensus-Based Explanations from an Anti-Misinformation Agentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.