mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Augmenting deep neural networks with symbolic knowledge: Towards trustworthy and interpretable AI for education

arXiv 2311.00393 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have shown to be amongst the most important artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in educational applications, providing adaptive educational services. However, their educational potential is limited in practice due to three major challenges: i) difficulty in incorporating symbolic educational knowledge (e.g., causal relationships, and practitioners' knowledge) in their development, ii) learning and reflecting biases, and iii) lack of interpretability. Given the high-risk nature of education, the integration of educational knowledge into ANNs becomes crucial for developing AI applications that adhere to essential educational restrictions, and provide interpretability over the predictions. This research argues that the neural-symbolic family of AI has the potential to address the named challenges. To this end, it adapts a neural-symbolic AI framework and accordingly develops an approach called NSAI, that injects and extracts educational knowledge into and from deep neural networks, for modelling learners computational thinking. Our findings reveal that the NSAI approach has better generalizability compared to deep neural networks trained merely on training data, as well as training data augmented by SMOTE and autoencoder methods. More importantly, unlike the other models, the NSAI approach prioritises robust representations that capture causal relationships between input features and output labels, ensuring safety in learning to avoid spurious correlations and control biases in training data. Furthermore, the NSAI approach enables the extraction of rules from the learned network, facilitating interpretation and reasoning about the path to predictions, as well as refining the initial educational knowledge. These findings imply that neural-symbolic AI can overcome the limitations of ANNs in education, enabling trustworthy and interpretable applications.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 94 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 1,000
  2. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  3. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  4. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  5. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  6. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
  7. 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 255
  8. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  9. 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 196
  10. 2016Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rulescited by 135
  11. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  12. 2021Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shiftcited by 65
7 more
  1. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Current Trendscited by 54
  2. 2019Augmenting Neural Networks with First-order Logiccited by 51
  3. 2021A Survey on Neural-symbolic Learning Systemscited by 39
  4. 2018AI in Education needs interpretable machine learning: Lessons from Open Learner Modellingcited by 18
  5. 2018GritNet: Student Performance Prediction with Deep Learningcited by 9
  6. 2017Delving Deeper into MOOC Student Dropout Predictioncited by 5
  7. 2023Autoencoder-Based Visual Anomaly Localization for Manufacturing Quality Controlcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.