Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Trustworthy AI serves as a foundational pillar for two major AI ethics conferences: AIES and FAccT. However, current research often adopts techno-centric approaches, focusing primarily on technical attributes such as reliability, robustness, and fairness, while overlooking the sociotechnical dimensions critical to understanding AI trustworthiness in real-world contexts. Objectives: This scoping review aims to examine how the AIES and FAccT communities conceptualize, measure, and validate AI trustworthiness, identifying major gaps and opportunities for advancing a holistic understanding of trustworthy AI systems. Methods: We conduct a scoping review of AIES and FAccT conference proceedings to date, systematically analyzing how trustworthiness is defined, operationalized, and applied across different research domains. Our analysis focuses on conceptualization approaches, measurement methods, verification and validation techniques, application areas, and underlying values. Results: While significant progress has been made in defining technical attributes such as transparency, accountability, and robustness, our findings reveal critical gaps. Current research often predominantly emphasizes technical precision at the expense of social and ethical considerations. The sociotechnical nature of AI systems remains less explored and trustworthiness emerges as a contested concept shaped by those with the power to define it. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach combining technical rigor with social, cultural, and institutional considerations is essential for advancing trustworthy AI. We propose actionable measures for the AI ethics community to adopt holistic frameworks that genuinely address the complex interplay between AI systems and society, ultimately promoting responsible technological development that benefits all stakeholders.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 127 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
32 of 127 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
- 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
- 2022Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reductioncited by 137
- 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 123
- 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
- 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
- 2024"I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trustcited by 67
20 more
- 2020"What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 56
- 2022Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspectivecited by 48
- 2023Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Toolscited by 34
- 2021Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
- 2023A Systematic Review on Fostering Appropriate Trust in Human-AI Interactioncited by 21
- 2021The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AIcited by 19
- 2022"There Is Not Enough Information": On the Effects of Explanations on Perceptions of Informational Fairness and Trustworthiness in Automated Decision-Makingcited by 19
- 2024From "AI" to Probabilistic Automation: How Does Anthropomorphization of Technical Systems Descriptions Influence Trust?cited by 18
- 2022Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research Contributions, Shortcomings, and Future Prospectscited by 14
- 2023Humans, AI, and Context: Understanding End-Users' Trust in a Real-World Computer Vision Applicationcited by 14
- 2023Explainability in AI Policies: A Critical Review of Communications, Reports, Regulations, and Standards in the EU, US, and UKcited by 13
- 2021Towards Accountability in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Public Administrationscited by 12
- 2019U.S. Public Opinion on the Governance of Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
- 2025LExT: Towards Evaluating Trustworthiness of Natural Language Explanationscited by 9
- 2021More Similar Values, More Trust? -- the Effect of Value Similarity on Trust in Human-Agent Interactioncited by 7
- 2022Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Studycited by 7
- 2025A Trustworthiness-based Metaphysics of Artificial Intelligence Systemscited by 6
- 2023Certification Labels for Trustworthy AI: Insights From an Empirical Mixed-Method Studycited by 5
- 2025Ties of Trust: a bowtie model to uncover trustor-trustee relationships in LLMscited by 2
- 2023Are You Worthy of My Trust?: A Socioethical Perspective on the Impacts of Trustworthy AI Systems on the Environment and Human Societycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanismscited by 3
- 2026AI as Entertainmentcited by 2
- 2026Alignment Is Not Enough: A Relational Framework for Moral Standing in Human-AI Interactioncited by 1
- 2026A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governancecited by 1
- 2026Trustworthiness Costs of Domain Adaptation in Small Language Models:A Cross-Architecture Empirical Studycited by 0
- 2026Convex AI Compositionality and the Governance of AI System Populationscited by 0
- 2026Convex AI Compositionality and the Governance of AI System Populations21 Sep 2026
- 2026Trustworthiness Costs of Domain Adaptation in Small Language Models:A Cross-Architecture Empirical Study23 Jul 2026
- 2026A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governance17 Jul 2026
- 2026Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanisms28 May 2026
- 2026Alignment Is Not Enough: A Relational Framework for Moral Standing in Human-AI Interaction13 Feb 2026
- 2026AI as Entertainment13 Jan 2026