mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairness

arXiv 1905.00569 ↗First posted 2 May 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 38

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) models trained on data from multiple demographic groups can inherit representation disparity (Hashimoto et al., 2018) that may exist in the data: the model may be less favorable to groups contributing less to the training process; this in turn can degrade population retention in these groups over time, and exacerbate representation disparity in the long run. In this study, we seek to understand the interplay between ML decisions and the underlying group representation, how they evolve in a sequential framework, and how the use of fairness criteria plays a role in this process. We show that the representation disparity can easily worsen over time under a natural user dynamics (arrival and departure) model when decisions are made based on a commonly used objective and fairness criteria, resulting in some groups diminishing entirely from the sample pool in the long run. It highlights the fact that fairness criteria have to be defined while taking into consideration the impact of decisions on user dynamics. Toward this end, we explain how a proper fairness criterion can be selected based on a general user dynamics model.

Key facts. Cited by 38 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 9; 2024: 9; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

38 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Fairness and Accuracy under Domain Generalizationcited by 24
  2. 2021Unintended Selection: Persistent Qualification Rate Disparities and Interventionscited by 18
  3. 2022What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspectivecited by 18
  4. 2022Subgroup Robustness Grows On Trees: An Empirical Baseline Investigationcited by 17
  5. 2023Runtime Monitoring of Dynamic Fairness Propertiescited by 17
  6. 2021Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Modelscited by 16
  7. 2021Towards Return Parity in Markov Decision Processescited by 12
  8. 2023A Classification of Feedback Loops and Their Relation to Biases in Automated Decision-Making Systemscited by 12
  9. 2023Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised Learningcited by 11
  10. 2024Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Predictioncited by 11
  11. 2024Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomescited by 8
  12. 2023Tier Balancing: Towards Dynamic Fairness over Underlying Causal Factorscited by 7
26 more
  1. 2024Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvementcited by 7
  2. 2021Precarity: Modeling the Long Term Effects of Compounded Decisions on Individual Instabilitycited by 5
  3. 2021Adaptive Data Debiasing through Bounded Explorationcited by 5
  4. 2022Social Bias Meets Data Bias: The Impacts of Labeling and Measurement Errors on Fairness Criteriacited by 5
  5. 2022Emergent specialization from participation dynamics and multi-learner retrainingcited by 5
  6. 2023Initializing Services in Interactive ML Systems for Diverse Userscited by 5
  7. 2024Strategic Usage in a Multi-Learner Settingcited by 3
  8. 2024Learning from Streaming Data when Users Choosecited by 2
  9. 2024Lookahead Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 2
  10. 2025The Statistical Fairness-Accuracy Frontiercited by 2
  11. 2023Asymptotically Fair Participation in Machine Learning Models: an Optimal Control Perspectivecited by 1
  12. 2024Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Multi-Agent Selection with Positive Reinforcementcited by 1
  13. 2024Understanding Decision Subjects' Engagement with and Perceived Fairness of AI Models When Opportunities of Qualification Improvement Existcited by 1
  14. 2025SPRINT: Stochastic Performative Prediction With Variance Reductioncited by 1
  15. 2025Demographic-Agnostic Fairness without Harmcited by 1
  16. 2025Achieving Fairness Without Harm via Selective Demographic Expertscited by 1
  17. 2026Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Toward Fairness Without Harm from Vision to LVLMscited by 1
  18. 2026Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamicscited by 1
  19. 2021Toward a Fairness-Aware Scoring System for Algorithmic Decision-Makingcited by 0
  20. 2021Identifying Best Fair Interventioncited by 0
  21. 2023Systemic Fairnesscited by 0
  22. 2023Near-Optimal Privacy-Preserving Learning for Max-Min Fair Multi-Agent Banditscited by 0
  23. 2024Fair Resource Allocation in Weakly Coupled Markov Decision Processescited by 0
  24. 2026Sequential Strategic Classification with Multi-Stage Selective Classifierscited by 0
  25. 2026Simulating Eutopia: Revisiting Long-term Fairness with Outcomes, Performativity, and Dynamicscited by 0
  26. 2026Performative Privacy: When Differential Privacy Maximizes Utilitycited by 0