Systemic Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to make or support decisions in a wide range of settings. With such expansive use there is also growing concern about the fairness of such methods. Prior literature on algorithmic fairness has extensively addressed risks and in many cases presented approaches to manage some of them. However, most studies have focused on fairness issues that arise from actions taken by a (single) focal decision-maker or agent. In contrast, most real-world systems have many agents that work collectively as part of a larger ecosystem. For example, in a lending scenario, there are multiple lenders who evaluate loans for applicants, along with policymakers and other institutions whose decisions also affect outcomes. Thus, the broader impact of any lending decision of a single decision maker will likely depend on the actions of multiple different agents in the ecosystem. This paper develops formalisms for firm versus systemic fairness, and calls for a greater focus in the algorithmic fairness literature on ecosystem-wide fairness - or more simply systemic fairness - in real-world contexts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2023.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
References · 20
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
- 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
- 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
- 2020Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systemscited by 89
- 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 53
- 2019On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learningcited by 48
8 more
- 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
- 2021The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithmscited by 44
- 2019The Disparate Equilibria of Algorithmic Decision Making when Individuals Invest Rationallycited by 41
- 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
- 2018From Fair Decision Making to Social Equalitycited by 36
- 2018Downstream Effects of Affirmative Actioncited by 34
- 2021Fairness in Information Access Systemscited by 27
- 2021A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.