mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Achieving Fairness Without Harm via Selective Demographic Experts

arXiv 2511.06293 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into human-centered domains such as healthcare, ensuring fairness while maintaining high predictive performance is critical. Existing bias mitigation techniques often impose a trade-off between fairness and accuracy, inadvertently degrading performance for certain demographic groups. In high-stakes domains like clinical diagnosis, such trade-offs are ethically and practically unacceptable. In this study, we propose a fairness-without-harm approach by learning distinct representations for different demographic groups and selectively applying demographic experts consisting of group-specific representations and personalized classifiers through a no-harm constrained selection. We evaluate our approach on three real-world medical datasets -- covering eye disease, skin cancer, and X-ray diagnosis -- as well as two face datasets. Extensive empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in achieving fairness without harm.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 41 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  8. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  9. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  10. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  11. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  12. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
11 more
  1. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  2. 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
  3. 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
  4. 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
  5. 2021Contrastive Learning for Fair Representationscited by 34
  6. 2023Harvard Glaucoma Fairness: A Retinal Nerve Disease Dataset for Fairness Learning and Fair Identity Normalizationcited by 31
  7. 2023Fairness and Accuracy under Domain Generalizationcited by 24
  8. 2019Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For Healthcarecited by 16
  9. 2021Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Modelscited by 16
  10. 2023Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised Learningcited by 11
  11. 2023Fair Classifiers that Abstain without Harmcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.