Achieving Fairness Without Harm via Selective Demographic Experts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into human-centered domains such as healthcare, ensuring fairness while maintaining high predictive performance is critical. Existing bias mitigation techniques often impose a trade-off between fairness and accuracy, inadvertently degrading performance for certain demographic groups. In high-stakes domains like clinical diagnosis, such trade-offs are ethically and practically unacceptable. In this study, we propose a fairness-without-harm approach by learning distinct representations for different demographic groups and selectively applying demographic experts consisting of group-specific representations and personalized classifiers through a no-harm constrained selection. We evaluate our approach on three real-world medical datasets -- covering eye disease, skin cancer, and X-ray diagnosis -- as well as two face datasets. Extensive empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in achieving fairness without harm.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
11 more
- 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
- 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
- 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
- 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
- 2021Contrastive Learning for Fair Representationscited by 34
- 2023Harvard Glaucoma Fairness: A Retinal Nerve Disease Dataset for Fairness Learning and Fair Identity Normalizationcited by 31
- 2023Fairness and Accuracy under Domain Generalizationcited by 24
- 2019Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For Healthcarecited by 16
- 2021Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Modelscited by 16
- 2023Loss Balancing for Fair Supervised Learningcited by 11
- 2023Fair Classifiers that Abstain without Harmcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.