mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Initializing Services in Interactive ML Systems for Diverse Users

arXiv 2312.11846 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates ML systems serving a group of users, with multiple models/services, each aimed at specializing to a sub-group of users. We consider settings where upon deploying a set of services, users choose the one minimizing their personal losses and the learner iteratively learns by interacting with diverse users. Prior research shows that the outcomes of learning dynamics, which comprise both the services' adjustments and users' service selections, hinge significantly on the initialization. However, finding good initializations faces two main challenges: (i) Bandit feedback: Typically, data on user preferences are not available before deploying services and observing user behavior; (ii) Suboptimal local solutions: The total loss landscape (i.e., the sum of loss functions across all users and services) is not convex and gradient-based algorithms can get stuck in poor local minima. We address these challenges with a randomized algorithm to adaptively select a minimal set of users for data collection in order to initialize a set of services. Under mild assumptions on the loss functions, we prove that our initialization leads to a total loss within a factor of the globally optimal total loss with complete user preference data, and this factor scales logarithmically in the number of services. This result is a generalization of the well-known k-means++ guarantee to a broad problem class, which is also of independent interest. The theory is complemented by experiments on real as well as semi-synthetic datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2023.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  2. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 508
  3. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 502
  4. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 444
  5. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  6. 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 323
  7. 2016Better Guarantees for k-Means and Euclidean k-Median by Primal-Dual Algorithmscited by 54
  8. 2019Eigenvalue and Generalized Eigenvalue Problems: Tutorialcited by 45
  9. 2020Meta-learning for mixed linear regressioncited by 44
  10. 2021How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learningcited by 41
  11. 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
  12. 2022Towards Sample-efficient Overparameterized Meta-learningcited by 21
6 more
  1. 2016Avoiding Imposters and Delinquents: Adversarial Crowdsourcing and Peer Predictioncited by 15
  2. 2020Improved Guarantees for k-means++ and k-means++ Parallelcited by 12
  3. 2022One for All: Simultaneous Metric and Preference Learning over Multiple Userscited by 6
  4. 2017Learning User Preferences to Incentivize Exploration in the Sharing Economycited by 4
  5. 2022Scalable Distributional Robustness in a Class of Non Convex Optimization with Guaranteescited by 2
  6. 2022Online SuBmodular + SuPermodular (BP) Maximization with Bandit Feedbackcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.