mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Return Parity in Markov Decision Processes

arXiv 2111.10476 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic decisions made by machine learning models in high-stakes domains may have lasting impacts over time. However, naive applications of standard fairness criterion in static settings over temporal domains may lead to delayed and adverse effects. To understand the dynamics of performance disparity, we study a fairness problem in Markov decision processes (MDPs). Specifically, we propose return parity, a fairness notion that requires MDPs from different demographic groups that share the same state and action spaces to achieve approximately the same expected time-discounted rewards. We first provide a decomposition theorem for return disparity, which decomposes the return disparity of any two MDPs sharing the same state and action spaces into the distance between group-wise reward functions, the discrepancy of group policies, and the discrepancy between state visitation distributions induced by the group policies. Motivated by our decomposition theorem, we propose algorithms to mitigate return disparity via learning a shared group policy with state visitation distributional alignment using integral probability metrics. We conduct experiments to corroborate our results, showing that the proposed algorithm can successfully close the disparity gap while maintaining the performance of policies on two real-world recommender system benchmark datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2021.

Builds on

34 of 54 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  2. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  5. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  6. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  7. 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 219
  8. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 184
  9. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
  10. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  11. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 161
  12. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
22 more
  1. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  2. 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 100
  3. 2017Runaway Feedback Loops in Predictive Policingcited by 97
  4. 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 95
  5. 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 78
  6. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  7. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
  8. 2020How Do Fair Decisions Fare in Long-term Qualification?cited by 60
  9. 2019On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learningcited by 49
  10. 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
  11. 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 42
  12. 2019The Disparate Equilibria of Algorithmic Decision Making when Individuals Invest Rationallycited by 41
  13. 2020Interactive Recommender System via Knowledge Graph-enhanced Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  14. 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
  15. 2018From Fair Decision Making to Social Equalitycited by 36
  16. 2019Equal Opportunity in Online Classification with Partial Feedbackcited by 35
  17. 2018Downstream Effects of Affirmative Actioncited by 34
  18. 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 33
  19. 2018Large-scale Interactive Recommendation with Tree-structured Policy Gradientcited by 30
  20. 2018Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problemscited by 29
  21. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regressioncited by 17
  22. 2018On preserving non-discrimination when combining expert advicecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: