Toward a Fairness-Aware Scoring System for Algorithmic Decision-Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scoring systems, as a type of predictive model, have significant advantages in interpretability and transparency and facilitate quick decision-making. As such, scoring systems have been extensively used in a wide variety of industries such as healthcare and criminal justice. However, the fairness issues in these models have long been criticized, and the use of big data and machine learning algorithms in the construction of scoring systems heightens this concern. In this paper, we propose a general framework to create fairness-aware, data-driven scoring systems. First, we develop a social welfare function that incorporates both efficiency and group fairness. Then, we transform the social welfare maximization problem into the risk minimization task in machine learning, and derive a fairness-aware scoring system with the help of mixed integer programming. Lastly, several theoretical bounds are derived for providing parameter selection suggestions. Our proposed framework provides a suitable solution to address group fairness concerns in the development of scoring systems. It enables policymakers to set and customize their desired fairness requirements as well as other application-specific constraints. We test the proposed algorithm with several empirical data sets. Experimental evidence supports the effectiveness of the proposed scoring system in achieving the optimal welfare of stakeholders and in balancing the needs for interpretability, fairness, and efficiency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 154 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2021.
Builds on
22 of 154 references.
References · 22
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
10 more
- 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
- 2015Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Optimized Medical Scoring Systemscited by 76
- 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
- 2015Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Predictioncited by 44
- 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
- 2019Group Retention when Using Machine Learning in Sequential Decision Making: the Interplay between User Dynamics and Fairnesscited by 38
- 2018Probably Approximately Metric-Fair Learningcited by 29
- 2020Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Biascited by 13
- 2018Approximation algorithms for stochastic clusteringcited by 7
- 2018Efficiency in Lung Transplant Allocation Strategiescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.