mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating VLMs for Autonomous Agent-Driven Geometry Clipping Detection in Video Game QA

arXiv 2607.25921 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we study the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for anomaly detection in an agent-driven game Quality Assurance (QA) pipeline focusing on geometry clipping. In this evaluation, a custom exploration agent navigates a game level to collect visual observations, while the automatic annotation pipeline provides frame-level clipping labels. This setup allows us to evaluate recent VLMs on a controlled anomaly detection task without manual annotation. We benchmark six recent VLMs (Gemini, GPT, Qwen, Gemma, Llama, and Ministral) under a zero-shot prompting setting and analyse their sensitivity to four prompt variants. Our results show that while the VLMs can capture visual cues associated with geometry clipping, they all produce substantial false positives on visually ambiguous frames such as near-contact geometry and partial occlusions. Gemini-3.1-Flash achieves the best overall accuracy and is the most robust to prompt variation, while open-source models exhibit large precision--recall swings depending on the prompt design. These findings suggest that current VLMs are best suited as high-recall candidate filters within multi-stage QA pipelines rather than as standalone bug detectors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 11 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 13 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026RefGlitch-Bench: A Benchmark for Reference-based Gameplay Glitch Detection with Vision-Language Models13 Apr
  2. 2025VideoGameQA-Bench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Video Game Quality Assurance21 May

Other references · 9

  1. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 839
  2. 2024PhysGame: Uncovering Physical Commonsense Violations in Gameplay Videoscited by 22
  3. 2022Using Reinforcement Learning for Load Testing of Video Gamescited by 11
  4. 2024Robust Imitation Learning for Automated Game Testingcited by 4
  5. 2022World of Bugs: A Platform for Automated Bug Detection in 3D Video Gamescited by 3
  6. 2022Go-Explore Complex 3D Game Environments for Automated Reachability Testingcited by 3
  7. 2025Bayesian Optimization-based Search for Agent Control in Automated Game Testingcited by 3
  8. 2024Behavioural Cloning in VizDoomcited by 2
  9. 2025Learning Representations in Video Game Agents with Supervised Contrastive Imitation Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026How Far Can VLMs Go for Visual Bug Detection? Studying 19,738 Keyframes from 41 Hours of Gameplay Videos
  2. 2024Level Up Your Tutorials: VLMs for Game Tutorials Quality Assessment
  3. 2026VLMs for Videogame Data Annotation
  4. 2026See, Symbolize, Act: Grounding VLMs with Spatial Representations for Better Gameplay
  5. 2025Cultivating Game Sense for Yourself: Making VLMs Gaming Experts
  6. 2025VideoGameBench: Can Vision-Language Models complete popular video games?
  7. 2026SceneActBench: Can Agents Act on the 3D Scenes They See?
  8. 2026AnomalyAgent: Training-Free Agentic Models for Zero-/Few-Shot Anomaly Detection