Detectors Learn the Wrong Thing: Shortcut-Resistant Adversarial Training Against Physically Realizable Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI-enabled visual perception systems are increasingly deployed in intelligent transportation infrastructure and autonomous vehicle related applications. However, physically realizable adversarial appearances pose a significant reliability challenge for these safety-critical systems. Adversarial training is effective, but repeated co-occurrence between adversarial texture and positive person instances can cause detectors to treat the texture itself as evidence of object presence, forming a patch texture shortcut. The detector may then treat texture as evidence for the target, causing false detections on texture-only inputs and weakening cross attack generalisation. We propose InsCAT, an instance-level contrastive adversarial training framework that prevents detectors from using adversarial texture as an independent decision cue. SICA aligns adversarial person features with matched clean features and separates them from texture-only negatives, while ROPO and Guard maintain online attack pressure and coordinate training. We evaluate eight independently generated attack textures on rendered nuScenes, INRIAPerson, printed garments, and three detector families. InsCAT achieves an average attack AP of 82.3% on rendered nuScenes, exceeding the strongest baseline by 11.1 points.Relative to AT-Mix, texture FPR decreases from 46.9% to 7.3%. Physical tests yield an F1 score of 96.6% and an FPR of 1.8%. Consistent gains across separately trained detectors demonstrate applicability across architectures with direct inference. The findings show that robust physical detection depends on preserving target related evidence while preventing adversarial texture from becoming an independent decision cu
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.
Builds on
40 of 48 references.
References · 40
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,550
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,625
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,492
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,498
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,944
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 935
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 641
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 516
28 more
- 2022DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingcited by 488
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2021FSCE: Few-Shot Object Detection via Contrastive Proposal Encodingcited by 168
- 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
- 2020Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 138
- 2022Adversarial Texture for Fooling Person Detectors in the Physical Worldcited by 96
- 2018Local Gradients Smoothing: Defense against localized adversarial attackscited by 86
- 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 76
- 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
- 2019Defending Against Physically Realizable Attacks on Image Classificationcited by 66
- 2022T-SEA: Transfer-based Self-Ensemble Attack on Object Detectioncited by 59
- 2019Towards Adversarially Robust Object Detectioncited by 55
- 2020Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patchescited by 50
- 2023Physically Realizable Natural-Looking Clothing Textures Evade Person Detectors via 3D Modelingcited by 41
- 2023Jedi: Entropy-based Localization and Removal of Adversarial Patchescited by 35
- 2024PAD: Patch-Agnostic Defense against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 32
- 2022PatchZero: Defending against Adversarial Patch Attacks by Detecting and Zeroing the Patchcited by 30
- 2021Meta Adversarial Training against Universal Patchescited by 19
- 2025ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppressioncited by 13
- 2023Defending Against Physical Adversarial Patch Attacks on Infrared Human Detectioncited by 4
- 2025AdvReal: Physical Adversarial Patch Generation Framework for Security Evaluation of Object Detection Systemscited by 4
- 2025AdvSwap: Covert Adversarial Perturbation with High Frequency Info-swapping for Autonomous Driving Perceptioncited by 3
- 2025PBCAT: Patch-based composite adversarial training against physically realizable attacks on object detectioncited by 3
- 2020Using Feature Alignment Can Improve Clean Average Precision and Adversarial Robustness in Object Detectioncited by 2
- 2026Higher-Order Adversarial Patches for Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.