Physics-Grounded Causal Auditing of End-to-End Driving Planners
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Imitation-learning end-to-end planners
Abstract (arXiv)
End-to-end (E2E) autonomous-driving planners trained by imitation are prone to statistical shortcuts: they associate scene elements that merely co-occur with expert actions (a roadside object, a building facade) with driving decisions, rather than the variables that causally determine them. Such causal confusion silently compromises reliability in long-tail scenarios, and it is difficult to detect, because prevailing open-loop metrics (L2 displacement and collision rate) are dominated by ego status and do not indicate whether a planner depends on spurious cues. Existing remedies based on causal-intervention training require retraining large models and cannot audit a planner that is already deployed. We present CADET, a training-free framework that audits, benchmarks, and repairs spurious reliance in pretrained E2E planners without any parameter update.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
19 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Test-Time Trajectory Optimization for Autonomous Driving5 Jun
- 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Driving22 Apr
Other references · 17
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
- 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 622
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
- 2024NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarkingcited by 354
- 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 288
- 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 252
- 2023Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?cited by 242
- 2024SparseDrive: End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Sparse Scene Representationcited by 241
- 2025Centaur: Robust End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Test-Time Trainingcited by 42
- 2025Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMscited by 21
5 more
- 2026CausalVAD: De-confounding End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Causal Interventioncited by 7
- 2025Benchmarking and Mitigating Sycophancy in Medical Vision Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025Beyond Patterns: Harnessing Causal Logic for Autonomous Driving Trajectory Predictioncited by 4
- 2025Structural Induced Exploration for Balanced and Scalable Multi-Robot Path Planningcited by 1
- 2025Cluster Aggregated GAN (CAG): A Cluster-Based Hybrid Model for Appliance Pattern Generationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Prioritizing Perception-Guided Self-Supervision: A New Paradigm for Causal Modeling in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2025Exposing the Copycat Problem of Imitation-based Planner: A Novel Closed-Loop Simulator, Causal Benchmark and Joint IL-RL Baseline
- 2026Learning to Explain While Planning: Rule-Aligned Diffusion Planning for Autonomous Driving
- 2024RuleFuser: An Evidential Bayes Approach for Rule Injection in Imitation Learned Planners and Predictors for Robustness under Distribution Shifts
- 2026Grounding What Shapes the Plan: Rethinking Groundedness for Physical Intelligence in Autonomous Driving
- 2024Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning
- 2026Planning-Oriented End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Architectures, Evaluation, and Emerging Paradigms
- 2026What Probing Reveals about Autonomous Driving: Linking Internal Prediction Errors to Ego Planning