mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Far Looks Up: Probing Spatial Representation in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2605.30161 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on spatial reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether this reflects structured 3D understanding or reliance on statistical shortcuts in natural images. We introduce a representation-level analysis framework that constructs minimal contrastive pairs to measure how spatial axes are organized and disentangled within VLM embeddings. Our analysis across multiple model families reveals a consistent vertical-distance entanglement: models conflate vertical image position with distance, mirroring the perspective bias of natural photographs. This bias produces a significant accuracy gap between perspective-consistent and counter-heuristic examples, and intensifies under data scaling even as overall benchmark accuracy improves. We further show that models with similar benchmark scores can exhibit different internal representations, and that these differences predict accuracy and robustness across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks. To isolate this bias from evaluation-set skew, we introduce SpatialTunnel, a synthetic benchmark designed to expose spatial shortcut biases by removing common correlations present in natural images. Experiments confirm that the entanglement is model-intrinsic, and that models with well-separated spatial axes exhibit greater robustness, suggesting that well-structured spatial representations lead to more reliable spatial reasoning across diverse benchmarks. Code and benchmark are available on the project page: https://cheolhong0916.github.io/whyfarlooksup.github.io/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 53 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

53 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026RoboBrain 2.5: Depth in Sight, Time in Mind20 Jan
  2. 2026Linear Mechanisms for Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Vision Language Models18 Jan
  3. 2025SpaceTools: Tool-Augmented Spatial Reasoning via Double Interactive RL3 Dec
  4. 2025Why Do MLLMs Struggle with Spatial Understanding? A Systematic Analysis from Data to Architecture2 Sep
  5. 2025RoboRefer: Towards Spatial Referring with Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Robotics4 Jun
  6. 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas3 Mar
  7. 2025Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Multimodal Models12 Feb
  8. 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models3 Jun
  9. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan
  10. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning30 Oct

Other references · 43

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  6. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  7. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  8. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  9. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  10. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  11. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  12. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
31 more
  1. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  2. 2022Objaverse: A Universe of Annotated 3D Objectscited by 1,522
  3. 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,354
  4. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  5. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  6. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
  7. 2023ScanNet++: A High-Fidelity Dataset of 3D Indoor Scenescited by 747
  8. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
  9. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
  10. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
  11. 2022ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generationcited by 369
  12. 2024Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Modelscited by 321
  13. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
  14. 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
  15. 2019Structured3D: A Large Photo-realistic Dataset for Structured 3D Modelingcited by 285
  16. 2024NVILA: Efficient Frontier Visual Language Modelscited by 206
  17. 2022Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wildcited by 159
  18. 2024RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Roboticscited by 133
  19. 2024Infinigen Indoors: Photorealistic Indoor Scenes using Procedural Generationcited by 129
  20. 2025From Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3Dcited by 127
  21. 2025Spatial Forcing: Implicit Spatial Representation Alignment for Vision-language-action Modelcited by 125
  22. 2020ACRONYM: A Large-Scale Grasp Dataset Based on Simulationcited by 115
  23. 2024SAT: Dynamic Spatial Aptitude Training for Multimodal Language Modelscited by 111
  24. 2024EmbSpatial-Bench: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding for Embodied Tasks with Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 100
  25. 2024Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguitiescited by 58
  26. 2023Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language modelscited by 43
  27. 2024Cubify Anything: Scaling Indoor 3D Object Detectioncited by 39
  28. 2024DepthCues: Evaluating Monocular Depth Perception in Large Vision Modelscited by 18
  29. 2025GraspMolmo: Generalizable Task-Oriented Grasping via Large-Scale Synthetic Data Generationcited by 9
  30. 2025From Behavioral Performance to Internal Competence: Interpreting Vision-Language Models with VLM-Lenscited by 9
  31. 2025Logical forms complement probability in understanding language model (and human) performancecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Consistent Yet Wrong: Evidence Insensitivity in Spatial Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026Spatial Reasoning is Not a Free Lunch: A Controlled Study on LLaVA
  4. 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026The Spatial Blindspot of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models
  7. 2025InternSpatial: A Comprehensive Dataset for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025SpaRE: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Synthetic Data