Revisiting Shape from Polarization in the Era of Vision Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show that, with polarization cues, a lightweight model trained on a small dataset can outperform RGB-only vision foundation models (VFMs) in single-shot object-level surface normal estimation. Shape from polarization (SfP) has long been studied due to the strong physical relationship between polarization and surface geometry. Meanwhile, driven by scaling laws, RGB-only VFMs trained on large datasets have recently achieved impressive performance and surpassed existing SfP methods. This situation raises questions about the necessity of polarization cues, which require specialized hardware and have limited training data. We argue that the weaker performance of prior SfP methods does not come from the polarization modality itself, but from domain gaps. These domain gaps mainly arise from two sources. First, existing synthetic datasets use limited and unrealistic 3D objects, with simple geometry and random texture maps that do not match the underlying shapes. Second, real-world polarization signals are often affected by sensor noise, which is not well modeled during training. To address the first issue, we render a high-quality polarization dataset using 1,954 3D-scanned real-world objects. We further incorporate pretrained DINOv3 priors to improve generalization to unseen objects. To address the second issue, we introduce polarization sensor-aware data augmentation that better reflects real-world conditions. With only 40K training scenes, our method significantly outperforms both state-of-the-art SfP approaches and RGB-only VFMs. Extensive experiments show that polarization cues enable a 33x reduction in training data or an 8x reduction in model parameters, while still achieving better performance than RGB-only counterparts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
44 of 78 references.
References · 44
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
- 2014Predicting Depth, Surface Normals and Semantic Labels with a Common Multi-Scale Convolutional Architecturecited by 483
- 2021Omnidata: A Scalable Pipeline for Making Multi-Task Mid-Level Vision Datasets from 3D Scanscited by 336
- 2024MoGe: Unlocking Accurate Monocular Geometry Estimation for Open-Domain Images with Optimal Training Supervisioncited by 290
- 2024GeoWizard: Unleashing the Diffusion Priors for 3D Geometry Estimation from a Single Imagecited by 283
- 2025MoGe-2: Accurate Monocular Geometry with Metric Scale and Sharp Detailscited by 250
32 more
- 2024StableNormal: Reducing Diffusion Variance for Stable and Sharp Normalcited by 153
- 2024Rethinking Inductive Biases for Surface Normal Estimationcited by 122
- 2024Fine-Tuning Image-Conditional Diffusion Models is Easier than You Thinkcited by 82
- 2020Polarized Reflection Removal with Perfect Alignment in the Wildcited by 69
- 2014Designing Deep Networks for Surface Normal Estimationcited by 59
- 2021Deep Polarization Imaging for 3D shape and SVBRDF Acquisitioncited by 56
- 2021Shape from Polarization for Complex Scenes in the Wildcited by 53
- 2022PANDORA: Polarization-Aided Neural Decomposition Of Radiancecited by 52
- 2024StitchFusion: Weaving Any Visual Modalities to Enhance Multimodal Semantic Segmentationcited by 38
- 2016Marr Revisited: 2D-3D Alignment via Surface Normal Predictioncited by 34
- 2020Surface Normal Estimation of Tilted Images via Spatial Rectifiercited by 34
- 2025Digital Twin Catalog: A Large-Scale Photorealistic 3D Object Digital Twin Datasetcited by 29
- 2023NeISF: Neural Incident Stokes Field for Geometry and Material Estimationcited by 25
- 2024NeRSP: Neural 3D Reconstruction for Reflective Objects with Sparse Polarized Imagescited by 22
- 2025PolarFree: Polarization-based Reflection-free Imagingcited by 18
- 2022Transparent Shape from a Single View Polarization Imagecited by 16
- 2024PISR: Polarimetric Neural Implicit Surface Reconstruction for Textureless and Specular Objectscited by 15
- 2021All-photon Polarimetric Time-of-Flight Imagingcited by 12
- 2022Perspective Phase Angle Model for Polarimetric 3D Reconstructioncited by 11
- 2025DAViD: Data-efficient and Accurate Vision Models from Synthetic Datacited by 11
- 2017Linear Differential Constraints for Photo-polarimetric Height Estimationcited by 9
- 2022Simultaneous Acquisition of High Quality RGB Image and Polarization Information using a Sparse Polarization Sensorcited by 9
- 2024NeISF++: Neural Incident Stokes Field for Polarized Inverse Rendering of Conductors and Dielectricscited by 9
- 2025PolGS: Polarimetric Gaussian Splatting for Fast Reflective Surface Reconstructioncited by 8
- 2024Polarization Wavefront Lidar: Learning Large Scene Reconstruction from Polarized Wavefrontscited by 7
- 2023SPIDeRS: Structured Polarization for Invisible Depth and Reflectance Sensingcited by 6
- 2024Deep Polarization Cues for Single-shot Shape and Subsurface Scattering Estimationcited by 6
- 2024Learning to Remove Wrinkled Transparent Film with Polarized Priorcited by 3
- 2025MultimodalStudio: A Heterogeneous Sensor Dataset and Framework for Neural Rendering across Multiple Imaging Modalitiescited by 3
- 2025Glossy Object Reconstruction with Cost-effective Polarized Acquisitioncited by 3
- 2024Exploiting Polarized Material Cues for Robust Car Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Thermal Polarimetric Multi-view Stereocited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.