mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GRASP: A novel benchmark for evaluating language GRounding And Situated Physics understanding in multimodal language models

arXiv 2311.09048 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 28

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents GRASP, a novel benchmark to evaluate the language grounding and physical understanding capabilities of video-based multimodal large language models (LLMs). This evaluation is accomplished via a two-tier approach leveraging Unity simulations. The first level tests for language grounding by assessing a model's ability to relate simple textual descriptions with visual information. The second level evaluates the model's understanding of "Intuitive Physics" principles, such as object permanence and continuity. In addition to releasing the benchmark, we use it to evaluate several state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs. Our evaluation reveals significant shortcomings in the language grounding and intuitive physics capabilities of these models. Although they exhibit at least some grounding capabilities, particularly for colors and shapes, these capabilities depend heavily on the prompting strategy. At the same time, all models perform below or at the chance level of 50% in the Intuitive Physics tests, while human subjects are on average 80% correct. These identified limitations underline the importance of using benchmarks like GRASP to monitor the progress of future models in developing these competencies.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

Builds on

32 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning29 Apr

Other references · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  8. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  9. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  10. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  11. 2023Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understandingcited by 1,461
  12. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
19 more
  1. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  2. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
  3. 2023Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Modelscited by 1,047
  4. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  5. 2023VideoChat: Chat-Centric Video Understandingcited by 851
  6. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  7. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 553
  8. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
  9. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  10. 2017Embodied Question Answeringcited by 335
  11. 2023PandaGPT: One Model To Instruction-Follow Them Allcited by 330
  12. 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 241
  13. 2016Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physicscited by 152
  14. 2017Visual Interaction Networkscited by 94
  15. 2018IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoningcited by 72
  16. 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
  17. 2022A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physicscited by 20
  18. 2021A Benchmark for Modeling Violation-of-Expectation in Physical Reasoning Across Event Categoriescited by 8
  19. 2021AVoE: A Synthetic 3D Dataset on Understanding Violation of Expectation for Artificial Cognitioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 13; 2026: 9.

28 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Video models are zero-shot learners and reasonerscited by 208
  2. 2024An Introduction to Vision-Language Modelingcited by 175
  3. 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 167
  4. 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 151
  5. 2025Back to the Features: DINO as a Foundation for Video World Modelscited by 56
  6. 2025IntPhys 2: Benchmarking Intuitive Physics Understanding In Complex Synthetic Environmentscited by 49
  7. 2023Visual cognition in multimodal large language modelscited by 38
  8. 2024What is the Visual Cognition Gap between Humans and Multimodal LLMs?cited by 30
  9. 2025A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairscited by 30
  10. 2025iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMscited by 24
  11. 2025Rethinking JEPA: Compute-Efficient Video SSL with Frozen Teacherscited by 11
  12. 2025MMSciBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Chinese Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 10
16 more
  1. 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suitecited by 9
  2. 2023SimLM: Can Language Models Infer Parameters of Physical Systems?cited by 5
  3. 2024Exploring Spatial Schema Intuitions in Large Language and Vision Modelscited by 4
  4. 2025CueTip: An Interactive and Explainable Physics-aware Pool Assistantcited by 3
  5. 2026VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstructioncited by 3
  6. 2026LiveK12Bench: Have Large Multimodal Models Truly Conquered High School-level Examinations?cited by 3
  7. 2025Pixels to Principles: Probing Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multimodal Language Modelscited by 2
  8. 2025InPhyRe Discovers: Large Multimodal Models Struggle in Inductive Physical Reasoningcited by 2
  9. 2026GEOPHYS: The Geometry of Physical Plausibilitycited by 2
  10. 2025xInv: Explainable Optimization of Inverse Problemscited by 0
  11. 2025Can you SPLICE it together? A Human Curated Benchmark for Probing Visual Reasoning in VLMscited by 0
  12. 2026Discovering High Level Patterns from Simulation Tracescited by 0
  13. 2026Beyond Static Vision: Scene Dynamic Field Unlocks Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 0
  14. 2026PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoningcited by 0
  15. 2026Do World Models Make Better Robots? A Survey of Evaluation Benchmarks for Predictive Embodied Intelligencecited by 0
  16. 2026PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loopcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Does Visual Grounding Enhance the Understanding of Embodied Knowledge in Large Language Models?
  2. 2025ExpVG: Investigating the Design Space of Visual Grounding in Multimodal Large Language Model
  3. 2024MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs
  4. 2025Towards Understanding Visual Grounding in Visual Language Models
  5. 2025GroundingME: Exposing the Visual Grounding Gap in MLLMs through Multi-Dimensional Evaluation
  6. 2023Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts?
  7. 2025Exploring Multimodal Perception in Large Language Models Through Perceptual Strength Ratings
  8. 2025PixFoundation 2.0: Do Video Multi-Modal LLMs Use Motion in Visual Grounding?