mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairs

arXiv 2506.09987 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 30

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing benchmarks for assessing the spatio-temporal understanding and reasoning abilities of video language models are susceptible to score inflation due to the presence of shortcut solutions based on superficial visual or textual cues. This paper mitigates the challenges in accurately assessing model performance by introducing the Minimal Video Pairs (MVP) benchmark, a simple shortcut-aware video QA benchmark for assessing the physical understanding of video language models. The benchmark is comprised of 55K high-quality multiple-choice video QA examples focusing on physical world understanding. Examples are curated from nine video data sources, spanning first-person egocentric and exocentric videos, robotic interaction data, and cognitive science intuitive physics benchmarks. To mitigate shortcut solutions that rely on superficial visual or textual cues and biases, each sample in MVP has a minimal-change pair -- a visually similar video accompanied by an identical question but an opposing answer. To answer a question correctly, a model must provide correct answers for both examples in the minimal-change pair; as such, models that solely rely on visual or textual biases would achieve below random performance. Human performance on MVP is 92.9%, while the best open-source state-of-the-art video-language model achieves 40.2% compared to random performance at 25%.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 70 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

70 of 95 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025V-STaR: Benchmarking Video-LLMs on Video Spatio-Temporal Reasoning14 Mar
  2. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
  3. 2024Vinoground: Scrutinizing LMMs over Dense Temporal Reasoning with Short Videos3 Oct
  4. 2023Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models23 May
  5. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality7 Apr
  6. 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Language1 Apr

Other references · 64

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  5. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  6. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  7. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  8. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  9. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  10. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  11. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  12. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
38 more
  1. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  2. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  3. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  4. 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
  5. 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,061
  6. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
  7. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  8. 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
  9. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  10. 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
  11. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  12. 2017TALL: Temporal Activity Localization via Language Querycited by 581
  13. 2019NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understandingcited by 530
  14. 2023InternVid: A Large-scale Video-Text Dataset for Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 488
  15. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  16. 2018TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answeringcited by 463
  17. 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 429
  18. 2022VIMA: General Robot Manipulation with Multimodal Promptscited by 403
  19. 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 352
  20. 2024LongVU: Spatiotemporal Adaptive Compression for Long Video-Language Understandingcited by 341
  21. 2019COIN: A Large-scale Dataset for Comprehensive Instructional Video Analysiscited by 316
  22. 2015MovieQA: Understanding Stories in Movies through Question-Answeringcited by 304
  23. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
  24. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 238
  25. 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Timecited by 217
  26. 2018Moments in Time Dataset: one million videos for event understandingcited by 215
  27. 2024STAR: A Benchmark for Situated Reasoning in Real-World Videoscited by 213
  28. 2024InternLM-XComposer-2.5: A Versatile Large Vision Language Model Supporting Long-Contextual Input and Outputcited by 195
  29. 2023A Simple LLM Framework for Long-Range Video Question-Answeringcited by 176
  30. 2024Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directionscited by 169
  31. 2022Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understandingcited by 167
  32. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
  33. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 144
  34. 2024Tarsier: Recipes for Training and Evaluating Large Video Description Modelscited by 140
  35. 2022Revealing Single Frame Bias for Video-and-Language Learningcited by 131
  36. 2024CinePile: A Long Video Question Answering Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 112
  37. 2024TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Modelscited by 96
  38. 2018IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoningcited by 72

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 26.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Models for Physical AIcited by 137
  2. 2026V-JEPA 2.1: Unlocking Dense Features in Video Self-Supervised Learningcited by 104
  3. 2025WoW: Towards a World omniscient World model Through Embodied Interactioncited by 66
  4. 2025Embodied AI Agents: Modeling the Worldcited by 57
  5. 2025PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AIcited by 30
  6. 2026VideoAuto-R1: Video Auto Reasoning via Thinking Once, Answering Twicecited by 19
  7. 2026Wow, wo, val! A Comprehensive Embodied World Model Evaluation Turing Testcited by 11
  8. 2026TimeBlind: A Spatio-Temporal Compositionality Benchmark for Video LLMscited by 11
  9. 2026PhysicsMind: Sim and Real Mechanics Benchmarking for Physical Reasoning and Prediction in Foundational VLMs and World Modelscited by 10
  10. 2026How Should World Models Be Evaluated for Embodied Decision-Making? A Decision-Making-Centric Positioncited by 9
  11. 2026VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstructioncited by 3
  12. 2026TRAPSBench: Vision-Language Models Encode but Fail to Express Epistemic Restraintcited by 3
18 more
  1. 2026Can Vision-Language Models Solve the Shell Game?cited by 2
  2. 2025Modeling the Mental World for Embodied AI: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 1
  3. 2026Learning Spatiotemporal Sensitivity in Video LLMs via Counterfactual Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  4. 2026How Do Video Foundation Models Encode Intuitive Physics? Probing Across Pretraining Paradigmscited by 1
  5. 2026Fast Enough to Act: Spatio-Temporal Visual Token Merging for Low-Latency Robotic VLMs and VLAscited by 1
  6. 2026Eye-Q: A Multilingual Benchmark for Visual Word Puzzle Solving and Image-to-Phrase Reasoningcited by 0
  7. 2026TOC-Bench: A Temporal Object Consistency Benchmark for Video Large Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2026VGenST-Bench: A Benchmark for Spatio-Temporal Reasoning via Active Video Synthesiscited by 0
  9. 2026VideoLatent: Video-Language Learning via Latent Self-Forcingcited by 0
  10. 2026PhyCheck: Fine-Grained Evidence-Grounded Dataset for Physical Law Understanding in Video-LLMscited by 0
  11. 2026FADE: From Passive Verification to Active Discovery in Counterfactual Video Understandingcited by 0
  12. 2026What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  13. 2026DementiaCare-Bench: A Modality-Validated Video Benchmarkcited by 0
  14. 2026PhysAI-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Agentic Decision-Making in Autonomous UAV-Centric Physical AIcited by 0
  15. 2026Video-HopChain: Multi-Hop Questions and Confidence-Gated Exploration for Video Reasoning Modelscited by 0
  16. 2026OmniFysics-Captioner Technical Report: Grounding Omni-Modal Understanding in the Physical World for Better Captioningcited by 0
  17. 2026PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loopcited by 0
  18. 2026Less from More: Reinforcing Sparse Video Reasoning from Dense Referencescited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Know-Show: Benchmarking Video-Language Models on Spatio-Temporal Grounded Reasoning
  2. 2024MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding
  3. 2025PhysVidBench: Language-Grounded Evaluation of Physical Commonsense in Text-to-Video Models
  4. 2026Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks for Comprehensive Video Understanding
  5. 2025CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models
  6. 2025V2P-Bench: Evaluating Video-Language Understanding with Visual Prompts for Better Human-Model Interaction
  7. 2026FineBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Fine-grained Human Activity Understanding
  8. 2024Lost in Time: A New Temporal Benchmark for VideoLLMs