mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarks for Physical Reasoning AI

arXiv 2312.10728 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2023cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical reasoning is a crucial aspect in the development of general AI systems, given that human learning starts with interacting with the physical world before progressing to more complex concepts. Although researchers have studied and assessed the physical reasoning of AI approaches through various specific benchmarks, there is no comprehensive approach to evaluating and measuring progress. Therefore, we aim to offer an overview of existing benchmarks and their solution approaches and propose a unified perspective for measuring the physical reasoning capacity of AI systems. We select benchmarks that are designed to test algorithmic performance in physical reasoning tasks. While each of the selected benchmarks poses a unique challenge, their ensemble provides a comprehensive proving ground for an AI generalist agent with a measurable skill level for various physical reasoning concepts. This gives an advantage to such an ensemble of benchmarks over other holistic benchmarks that aim to simulate the real world by intertwining its complexity and many concepts. We group the presented set of physical reasoning benchmarks into subcategories so that more narrow generalist AI agents can be tested first on these groups.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 116 of its 135 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

Builds on

116 of 135 references.

References · 116

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  7. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  8. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  9. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  10. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  11. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
  12. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
38 more
  1. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
  2. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  3. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
  4. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  5. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  6. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  7. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  8. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  9. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 760
  10. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
  11. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 484
  12. 2021A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Taskscited by 261
  13. 2021Conditional Object-Centric Learning from Videocited by 248
  14. 2019GENESIS: Generative Scene Inference and Sampling with Object-Centric Latent Representationscited by 227
  15. 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Timecited by 218
  16. 2018Distractor-aware Siamese Networks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 187
  17. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  18. 2020Hierarchical Conditional Relation Networks for Video Question Answeringcited by 163
  19. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 153
  20. 2021Illiterate DALL-E Learns to Composecited by 147
  21. 2022SlotFormer: Unsupervised Visual Dynamics Simulation with Object-Centric Modelscited by 147
  22. 2022Simple Unsupervised Object-Centric Learning for Complex and Naturalistic Videoscited by 139
  23. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  24. 2019CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions and TEmporal Reasoningcited by 137
  25. 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
  26. 2021GENESIS-V2: Inferring Unordered Object Representations without Iterative Refinementcited by 109
  27. 2021Make It Move: Controllable Image-to-Video Generation with Text Descriptionscited by 88
  28. 2021Coordination Among Neural Modules Through a Shared Global Workspacecited by 85
  29. 2022Video Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms and Challengescited by 84
  30. 2019CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamicscited by 81
  31. 2021Neural Production Systems: Learning Rule-Governed Visual Dynamicscited by 75
  32. 2018IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoningcited by 73
  33. 2018Relational Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  34. 2021SIMONe: View-Invariant, Temporally-Abstracted Object Representations via Unsupervised Video Decompositioncited by 69
  35. 2021Grounding Physical Concepts of Objects and Events Through Dynamic Visual Reasoningcited by 68
  36. 2018Propagation Networks for Model-Based Control Under Partial Observationcited by 64
  37. 2022ComPhy: Compositional Physical Reasoning of Objects and Events from Videoscited by 63
  38. 2019Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoningcited by 61

50 most cited of 116 All 116 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

8 papers.