mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

C2F-Space: Coarse-to-Fine Space Grounding for Spatial Instructions using Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2511.15333 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2025cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Space grounding refers to localizing a set of spatial references described in natural language instructions. Traditional methods often fail to account for complex reasoning -- such as distance, geometry, and inter-object relationships -- while vision-language models (VLMs), despite strong reasoning abilities, struggle to produce a fine-grained region of outputs. To overcome these limitations, we propose C2F-Space, a novel coarse-to-fine space-grounding framework that (i) estimates an approximated yet spatially consistent region using a VLM, then (ii) refines the region to align with the local environment through superpixelization. For the coarse estimation, we design a grid-based visual-grounding prompt with a propose-validate strategy, maximizing VLM's spatial understanding and yielding physically and semantically valid canonical region (i.e., ellipses). For the refinement, we locally adapt the region to surrounding environment without over-relaxed to free space. We construct a new space-grounding benchmark and compare C2F-Space with five state-of-the-art baselines using success rate and intersection-over-union. Our C2F-Space significantly outperforms all baselines. Our ablation study confirms the effectiveness of each module in the two-step process and their synergistic effect of the combined framework. We finally demonstrate the applicability of C2F-Space to simulated robotic pick-and-place tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.

Builds on

32 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics25 Nov
  2. 2024TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial Reasoners4 Jun
  3. 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models3 Jun
  4. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan

Other references · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  6. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  7. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  8. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  9. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
  10. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 929
  11. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
  12. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
16 more
  1. 2021CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulationcited by 622
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  3. 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 439
  4. 2016Visual Relationship Detection with Language Priorscited by 334
  5. 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMscited by 218
  6. 2023ViP-LLaVA: Making Large Multimodal Models Understand Arbitrary Visual Promptscited by 161
  7. 2016Voxblox: Incremental 3D Euclidean Signed Distance Fields for On-Board MAV Planningcited by 150
  8. 2019Volumetric Instance-Aware Semantic Mapping and 3D Object Discoverycited by 80
  9. 2021Semantics for Robotic Mapping, Perception and Interaction: A Surveycited by 56
  10. 2025PointArena: Probing Multimodal Grounding Through Language-Guided Pointingcited by 31
  11. 2023Energy-based Models are Zero-Shot Planners for Compositional Scene Rearrangementcited by 30
  12. 2022Ground then Navigate: Language-guided Navigation in Dynamic Scenescited by 20
  13. 2020Spatial Reasoning from Natural Language Instructions for Robot Manipulationcited by 16
  14. 2023Superpixel Transformers for Efficient Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
  15. 2024LINGO-Space: Language-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Spacecited by 8
  16. 2022Differentiable Parsing and Visual Grounding of Natural Language Instructions for Object Placementcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SpatialCORE: Confidence-Aware Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision--Language Models
  2. 2025From Objects to Anywhere: A Holistic Benchmark for Multi-level Visual Grounding in 3D Scenes
  3. 2023Towards Grounded Visual Spatial Reasoning in Multi-Modal Vision Language Models
  4. 2025Exploring Spatial Language Grounding Through Referring Expressions
  5. 2026Spatial Reasoning is Not a Free Lunch: A Controlled Study on LLaVA
  6. 2026Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?
  7. 2025Referring Expressions as a Lens into Spatial Language Grounding in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding