mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Referring Expressions as a Lens into Spatial Language Grounding in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2511.06146 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial Reasoning is an important component of human cognition and is an area in which the latest Vision-language models (VLMs) show signs of difficulty. The current analysis works use image captioning tasks and visual question answering. In this work, we propose using the Referring Expression Comprehension task instead as a platform for the evaluation of spatial reasoning by VLMs. This platform provides the opportunity for a deeper analysis of spatial comprehension and grounding abilities when there is 1) ambiguity in object detection, 2) complex spatial expressions with a longer sentence structure and multiple spatial relations, and 3) expressions with negation ('not'). In our analysis, we use task-specific architectures as well as large VLMs and highlight their strengths and weaknesses in dealing with these specific situations. While all these models face challenges with the task at hand, the relative behaviors depend on the underlying models and the specific categories of spatial semantics (topological, directional, proximal, etc.). Our results highlight these challenges and behaviors and provide insight into research gaps and future directions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2025.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning30 Oct

Other references · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  4. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  5. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  6. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  7. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  8. 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 559
  9. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
  10. 2018MAttNet: Modular Attention Network for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 427
  11. 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Roboticscited by 242
  12. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 101
8 more
  1. 2020Cops-Ref: A new Dataset and Task on Compositional Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 50
  2. 2023What's Left? Concept Grounding with Logic-Enhanced Foundation Modelscited by 33
  3. 2024ChatterBox: Multi-round Multimodal Referring and Groundingcited by 24
  4. 2023Pushdown Layers: Encoding Recursive Structure in Transformer Language Modelscited by 18
  5. 2021Systematic Generalization on gSCAN: What is Nearly Solved and What is Next?cited by 15
  6. 2024NeSyCoCo: A Neuro-Symbolic Concept Composer for Compositional Generalizationcited by 13
  7. 2025NePTune: A Neuro-Pythonic Framework for Tunable Compositional Reasoning on Vision-Languagecited by 8
  8. 2018How clever is the FiLM model, and how clever can it be?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Exploring Spatial Language Grounding Through Referring Expressions
  2. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023Towards Grounded Visual Spatial Reasoning in Multi-Modal Vision Language Models
  4. 2024Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models
  6. 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas
  7. 2026Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?
  8. 2026Evaluation of Multilingual Ability to Use Spatial Deictic Expressions in Vision-Language Models