mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HYPE: Hybrid Planning with Ego Proposal-Conditioned Predictions

arXiv 2510.12733 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safe and interpretable motion planning in complex urban environments needs to reason about bidirectional multi-agent interactions. This reasoning requires to estimate the costs of potential ego driving maneuvers. Many existing planners generate initial trajectories with sampling-based methods and refine them by optimizing on learned predictions of future environment states, which requires a cost function that encodes the desired vehicle behavior. Designing such a cost function can be very challenging, especially if a wide range of complex urban scenarios has to be considered. We propose HYPE: HYbrid Planning with Ego proposal-conditioned predictions, a planner that integrates multimodal trajectory proposals from a learned proposal model as heuristic priors into a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) refinement. To model bidirectional interactions, we introduce an ego-conditioned occupancy prediction model, enabling consistent, scene-aware reasoning. Our design significantly simplifies cost function design in refinement by considering proposal-driven guidance, requiring only minimalistic grid-based cost terms. Evaluations on large-scale real-world benchmarks nuPlan and DeepUrban show that HYPE effectively achieves state-of-the-art performance, especially in safety and adaptability.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

27 of 34 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 485
  3. 2022TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Drivingcited by 477
  4. 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 391
  5. 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 365
  6. 2019Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 343
  7. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 240
  8. 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 238
  9. 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 211
  10. 2023Think Twice before Driving: Towards Scalable Decoders for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 168
  11. 2023GameFormer: Game-theoretic Modeling and Learning of Transformer-based Interactive Prediction and Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 141
  12. 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradientscited by 122
15 more
  1. 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 99
  2. 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 84
  3. 2020PiP: Planning-informed Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
  4. 2022Differentiable Integrated Motion Prediction and Planning with Learnable Cost Function for Autonomous Drivingcited by 71
  5. 2021SafetyNet: Safe planning for real-world self-driving vehicles using machine-learned policiescited by 68
  6. 2023DTPP: Differentiable Joint Conditional Prediction and Cost Evaluation for Tree Policy Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 46
  7. 2023From Prediction to Planning With Goal Conditioned Lane Graph Traversalscited by 45
  8. 2022DiffStack: A Differentiable and Modular Control Stack for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 36
  9. 2023The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Reviewcited by 29
  10. 2023Rethinking Imitation-based Planner for Autonomous Drivingcited by 25
  11. 2018Search-based optimal motion planning for automated drivingcited by 24
  12. 2023Tree-structured Policy Planning with Learned Behavior Modelscited by 24
  13. 2021Contingencies from Observations: Tractable Contingency Planning with Learned Behavior Modelscited by 22
  14. 2022Efficient Game-Theoretic Planning with Prediction Heuristic for Socially-Compliant Autonomous Drivingcited by 13
  15. 2018Decentralized Cooperative Planning for Automated Vehicles with Hierarchical Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.