HYPE: Hybrid Planning with Ego Proposal-Conditioned Predictions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Safe and interpretable motion planning in complex urban environments needs to reason about bidirectional multi-agent interactions. This reasoning requires to estimate the costs of potential ego driving maneuvers. Many existing planners generate initial trajectories with sampling-based methods and refine them by optimizing on learned predictions of future environment states, which requires a cost function that encodes the desired vehicle behavior. Designing such a cost function can be very challenging, especially if a wide range of complex urban scenarios has to be considered. We propose HYPE: HYbrid Planning with Ego proposal-conditioned predictions, a planner that integrates multimodal trajectory proposals from a learned proposal model as heuristic priors into a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) refinement. To model bidirectional interactions, we introduce an ego-conditioned occupancy prediction model, enabling consistent, scene-aware reasoning. Our design significantly simplifies cost function design in refinement by considering proposal-driven guidance, requiring only minimalistic grid-based cost terms. Evaluations on large-scale real-world benchmarks nuPlan and DeepUrban show that HYPE effectively achieves state-of-the-art performance, especially in safety and adaptability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 485
- 2022TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Drivingcited by 477
- 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 391
- 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 365
- 2019Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 343
- 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 240
- 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 238
- 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 211
- 2023Think Twice before Driving: Towards Scalable Decoders for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 168
- 2023GameFormer: Game-theoretic Modeling and Learning of Transformer-based Interactive Prediction and Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 141
- 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradientscited by 122
15 more
- 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 99
- 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 84
- 2020PiP: Planning-informed Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
- 2022Differentiable Integrated Motion Prediction and Planning with Learnable Cost Function for Autonomous Drivingcited by 71
- 2021SafetyNet: Safe planning for real-world self-driving vehicles using machine-learned policiescited by 68
- 2023DTPP: Differentiable Joint Conditional Prediction and Cost Evaluation for Tree Policy Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 46
- 2023From Prediction to Planning With Goal Conditioned Lane Graph Traversalscited by 45
- 2022DiffStack: A Differentiable and Modular Control Stack for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 36
- 2023The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Reviewcited by 29
- 2023Rethinking Imitation-based Planner for Autonomous Drivingcited by 25
- 2018Search-based optimal motion planning for automated drivingcited by 24
- 2023Tree-structured Policy Planning with Learned Behavior Modelscited by 24
- 2021Contingencies from Observations: Tractable Contingency Planning with Learned Behavior Modelscited by 22
- 2022Efficient Game-Theoretic Planning with Prediction Heuristic for Socially-Compliant Autonomous Drivingcited by 13
- 2018Decentralized Cooperative Planning for Automated Vehicles with Hierarchical Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025SpaceDrive: Infusing Spatial Awareness into VLM-based Autonomous Drivingcited by 28
- 2026DiffuSearch: How Hybrid Trajectory Planning Benefits from Aligned Objectives in Diffusion and Action Spacecited by 1
- 2026INTERACT: Interactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Anchor-Conditioned Prediction and Trust-Region Refinementcited by 0
- 2026INTERACT: Interactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Anchor-Conditioned Prediction and Trust-Region Refinement25 Sep 2026
- 2026DiffuSearch: How Hybrid Trajectory Planning Benefits from Aligned Objectives in Diffusion and Action Space2 Sep 2026
- 2025SpaceDrive: Infusing Spatial Awareness into VLM-based Autonomous Driving11 Dec 2025