INTERACT: Interactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Anchor-Conditioned Prediction and Trust-Region Refinement
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Imitation-learning end-to-end planners
Abstract (arXiv)
Driving in dense urban traffic is interactive: whether a merge or an unprotected turn succeeds depends on how surrounding agents respond to the ego vehicle. Conventional planners predict first and plan second and, therefore, cannot account for this dependency. Methods that integrate prediction and planning either train both jointly, which introduces task interference, or keep them separate and are restricted to a predefined set of proposals. We present INTERACT: Interactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Anchor-Conditioned Prediction and Trust-Region Refinement. Our key insight is that surrounding agents react to the intent a trajectory expresses rather than to its exact realization, so a single reactive prediction stays valid across an entire family of plans. INTERACT therefore decomposes interactive planning into prediction across driving intents and optimization within each intent. We derive a small set of diverse intents, which we call anchors, from map geometry, query a dedicated ego-conditioned prediction model once per anchor, and refine every anchor with the Cross-Entropy Method under a trust-region penalty that keeps the refined plan close enough to its anchor for the conditioned reaction to still apply. Prediction thus remains a separate model, avoiding task interference, while conditioning on anchors preserves the dependency. Because each anchor is refined continuously, the final plan is not restricted to the anchor set, yet INTERACT requires only one predictor query per anchor rather than one per candidate plan, with all anchors processed in parallel. On the nuPlan and interPlan closed-loop benchmarks, INTERACT sets a new state of the art, with the largest gains precisely in the interactive scenarios that motivate the method. The code will be released upon acceptance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
23 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2026TerraZero: Procedural Driving Simulation for Zero-Demonstration Self-Play at Scale14 Jul
- 2026Test-Time Trajectory Optimization for Autonomous Driving5 Jun
- 2025Driving is a Game: Combining Planning and Prediction with Bayesian Iterative Best Response3 Dec
- 2025Perfect Prediction or Plenty of Proposals? What Matters Most in Planning for Autonomous Driving17 Oct
- 2025CoPlanner: An Interactive Motion Planner with Contingency-Aware Diffusion for Autonomous Driving21 Sep
- 2025Diffusion-Based Planning for Autonomous Driving with Flexible Guidance26 Jan
- 2024Hybrid-Prediction Integrated Planning for Autonomous Driving4 Feb
- 2023DTPP: Differentiable Joint Conditional Prediction and Cost Evaluation for Tree Policy Planning in Autonomous Driving9 Oct
- 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradients27 Sep
Other references · 14
- 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
- 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 242
- 2022PlanT: Explainable Planning Transformers via Object-Level Representationscited by 105
- 2020Sample-efficient Cross-Entropy Method for Real-time Planningcited by 95
- 2020PiP: Planning-informed Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
- 2023LAformer: Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving with Lane-Aware Scene Constraintscited by 53
- 2023From Prediction to Planning With Goal Conditioned Lane Graph Traversalscited by 45
- 2024Can Vehicle Motion Planning Generalize to Realistic Long-tail Scenarios?cited by 38
- 2023The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Reviewcited by 29
- 2023Tree-structured Policy Planning with Learned Behavior Modelscited by 24
- 2023MBAPPE: MCTS-Built-Around Prediction for Planning Explicitlycited by 11
- 2025HYPE: Hybrid Planning with Ego Proposal-Conditioned Predictionscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What Probing Reveals about Autonomous Driving: Linking Internal Prediction Errors to Ego Planning
- 2024Tractable Joint Prediction and Planning over Discrete Behavior Modes for Urban Driving
- 2025FocalAD: Local Motion Planning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2026ProDrive: Proactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Ego-Environment Co-Evolution
- 2026GraphWorld: Long-Horizon Planning with World Models for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2023PPAD: Iterative Interactions of Prediction and Planning for End-to-end Autonomous Driving
- 2022Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Driving among Risk-Aware Human Drivers
- 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Driving