mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tree-structured Policy Planning with Learned Behavior Models

arXiv 2301.11902 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2023cs.RO cs.SY eess.SYcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) need to reason about the multimodal behavior of neighboring agents while planning their own motion. Many existing trajectory planners seek a single trajectory that performs well under all plausible futures simultaneously, ignoring bi-directional interactions and thus leading to overly conservative plans. Policy planning, whereby the ego agent plans a policy that reacts to the environment's multimodal behavior, is a promising direction as it can account for the action-reaction interactions between the AV and the environment. However, most existing policy planners do not scale to the complexity of real autonomous vehicle applications: they are either not compatible with modern deep learning prediction models, not interpretable, or not able to generate high quality trajectories. To fill this gap, we propose Tree Policy Planning (TPP), a policy planner that is compatible with state-of-the-art deep learning prediction models, generates multistage motion plans, and accounts for the influence of ego agent on the environment behavior. The key idea of TPP is to reduce the continuous optimization problem into a tractable discrete Markov Decision Process (MDP) through the construction of two tree structures: an ego trajectory tree for ego trajectory options, and a scenario tree for multi-modal ego-conditioned environment predictions. We demonstrate the efficacy of TPP in closed-loop simulations based on real-world nuScenes dataset and results show that TPP scales to realistic AV scenarios and significantly outperforms non-policy baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 9; 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 238
  2. 2023LLM-Assist: Enhancing Closed-Loop Planning with Language-Based Reasoningcited by 59
  3. 2023DTPP: Differentiable Joint Conditional Prediction and Cost Evaluation for Tree Policy Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 46
  4. 2024Solving Motion Planning Tasks with a Scalable Generative Modelcited by 40
  5. 2023The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Reviewcited by 29
  6. 2023trajdata: A Unified Interface to Multiple Human Trajectory Datasetscited by 25
  7. 2023Interactive Joint Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 13
  8. 2023End-To-End Planning of Autonomous Driving in Industry and Academia: 2022-2023cited by 11
  9. 2023Categorical Traffic Transformer: Interpretable and Diverse Behavior Prediction with Tokenized Latentcited by 10
  10. 2025Trends in Motion Prediction Toward Deployable and Generalizable Autonomy: A Revisit and Perspectivescited by 5
  11. 2024A Study on Training and Developing Large Language Models for Behavior Tree Generationcited by 4
  12. 2024Pioneering SE(2)-Equivariant Trajectory Planning for Automated Drivingcited by 4
12 more
  1. 2025CoPlanner: An Interactive Motion Planner with Contingency-Aware Diffusion for Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
  2. 2025Perfect Prediction or Plenty of Proposals? What Matters Most in Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
  3. 2023Multi-Predictor Fusion: Combining Learning-based and Rule-based Trajectory Predictorscited by 3
  4. 2025HYPE: Hybrid Planning with Ego Proposal-Conditioned Predictionscited by 3
  5. 2024DECODE: Domain-aware Continual Domain Expansion for Motion Predictioncited by 2
  6. 2026DiffuSearch: How Hybrid Trajectory Planning Benefits from Aligned Objectives in Diffusion and Action Spacecited by 1
  7. 2024Planning-Aware Diffusion Networks for Enhanced Motion Forecasting in Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
  8. 2025Conditional Prediction by Simulation for Automated Drivingcited by 0
  9. 2025Mode Collapse Happens: Evaluating Critical Interactions in Joint Trajectory Prediction Modelscited by 0
  10. 2026Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst: Occlusion-Aware Contingency Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 0
  11. 2026Optimizing ML Workload Partitioning between CPUs and CIM Accelerators for Heterogeneous Computingcited by 0
  12. 2026INTERACT: Interactive Planning for Autonomous Driving via Anchor-Conditioned Prediction and Trust-Region Refinementcited by 0