Wonder Wins Ways: Curiosity-Driven Exploration through Multi-Agent Contextual Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous exploration in complex multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with sparse rewards critically depends on providing agents with effective intrinsic motivation. While artificial curiosity offers a powerful self-supervised signal, it often confuses environmental stochasticity with meaningful novelty. Moreover, existing curiosity mechanisms exhibit a uniform novelty bias, treating all unexpected observations equally. However, peer behavior novelty, which encode latent task dynamics, are often overlooked, resulting in suboptimal exploration in decentralized, communication-free MARL settings. To this end, inspired by how human children adaptively calibrate their own exploratory behaviors via observing peers, we propose a novel approach to enhance multi-agent exploration. We introduce CERMIC, a principled framework that empowers agents to robustly filter noisy surprise signals and guide exploration by dynamically calibrating their intrinsic curiosity with inferred multi-agent context. Additionally, CERMIC generates theoretically-grounded intrinsic rewards, encouraging agents to explore state transitions with high information gain. We evaluate CERMIC on benchmark suites including VMAS, Meltingpot, and SMACv2. Empirical results demonstrate that exploration with CERMIC significantly outperforms SoTA algorithms in sparse-reward environments.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
31 of 47 references.
References · 31
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
- 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 212
19 more
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 194
- 2014Learning to Optimize via Information-Directed Samplingcited by 168
- 2022SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 122
- 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 98
- 2022VMAS: A Vectorized Multi-Agent Simulator for Collective Robot Learningcited by 68
- 2021Cooperative Exploration for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
- 2021Episodic Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Curiosity-Driven Explorationcited by 49
- 2022Melting Pot 2.0cited by 40
- 2019Bootstrapping Upper Confidence Boundcited by 36
- 2022MASER: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Subgoals Generated from Experience Replay Buffercited by 34
- 2024MaxInfoRL: Boosting exploration in reinforcement learning through information gain maximizationcited by 30
- 2020Active World Model Learning with Progress Curiositycited by 28
- 2021How to Stay Curious while Avoiding Noisy TVs using Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimationcited by 27
- 2021Curiosity-Driven Exploration via Latent Bayesian Surprisecited by 22
- 2021Dynamic Bottleneck for Robust Self-Supervised Explorationcited by 21
- 2024Settling Decentralized Multi-Agent Coordinated Exploration by Novelty Sharingcited by 6
- 2024Individual Contributions as Intrinsic Exploration Scaffolds for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2025SPECTra: Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Permutation-Free Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanismscited by 21
- 2026DreamSAC: Learning Hamiltonian World Models via Symmetry Explorationcited by 1
- 2026Quality-Aware Exploration Budget Allocation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Escaping Local Views: Discovering Latent Concepts for Interpretable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Escaping Local Views: Discovering Latent Concepts for Interpretable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2026
- 2026From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms7 May 2026
- 2026Quality-Aware Exploration Budget Allocation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning3 May 2026
- 2026DreamSAC: Learning Hamiltonian World Models via Symmetry Exploration8 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration without Harm from Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle
- 2026Endogenous Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsic Curiosity
- 2025From Curiosity to Competence: How World Models Interact with the Dynamics of Exploration
- 2026Remember to be Curious: Episodic Context and Persistent Worlds for 3D Exploration
- 2025Behavioral Exploration: Learning to Explore via In-Context Adaptation
- 2025An Information-Geometric Approach to Artificial Curiosity
- 2022Towards Improving Exploration in Self-Imitation Learning using Intrinsic Motivation
- 2026Multi-Agent LLMs Fail to Explore Each Other