Multi-Agent LLMs Fail to Explore Each Other
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another. We show that modern LLM agents fail to do so, often exhibiting myopic and polarized interaction patterns that lead to suboptimal coordination and increased regret. We formalize this challenge as the Multi-Agent Exploration problem, modeling it as a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) problem in which agents must probe peers to infer their capabilities and identify effective interaction strategies. To address this, we introduce Multi- Agent Contextual Exploration (MACE), a lightweight framework that explicitly promotes exploration through structured peer selection. Across both contextual and parametric diversity settings, MACE substantially improves exploration behavior and downstream task performance. We further show theoretically that the value of exploration increases with agent diversity. Overall, our results highlight a fundamental limitation of current LLM agents and underscore the importance of explicitly guided exploration for reliable multi-agent autonomy. Code will be released in https://github.com/deeplearning-wisc/mace
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
23 of 66 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents14 Apr
- 2025HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems17 May
- 2025From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review28 Apr
- 2025Self-Resource Allocation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems2 Apr
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs10 Jan
- 2024AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platform21 Feb
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges21 Jan
- 2023Balancing Autonomy and Alignment: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy for Autonomous LLM-powered Multi-Agent Architectures5 Oct
Other references · 15
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2025AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Societycited by 186
- 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMscited by 114
- 2024GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussioncited by 67
- 2026Group-Evolving Agents: Open-Ended Self-Improvement via Experience Sharingcited by 36
- 2026"Humans welcome to observe": A First Look at the Agent Social Network Moltbookcited by 26
- 2026Intelligent AI Delegationcited by 18
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Look Before You Leap: Autonomous Exploration for LLM Agents
- 2026Expanding LLM Agent Boundaries with Strategy-Guided Exploration
- 2026Multi-Agent LLMs for Adaptive Acquisition in Bayesian Optimization
- 2026Multi2: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Decision-Making with LLM-Based Agents in Interactive Environments
- 2024AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environments
- 2024Can large language models explore in-context?
- 2026MARTI-MARS2: Scaling Multi-Agent Self-Search via Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation
- 2026COOP2: Defining, Observing, and Repairing Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems