mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Count2Density: Crowd Density Estimation without Location-level Annotations

arXiv 2509.03170 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Crowd density estimation is a well-known computer vision task aimed at estimating the density distribution of people in an image. The main challenge in this domain is the reliance on fine-grained location-level annotations, (i.e. points placed on top of each individual) to train deep networks. Collecting such detailed annotations is both tedious, time-consuming, and poses a significant barrier to scalability for real-world applications. To alleviate this burden, we present Count2Density: a novel pipeline designed to predict meaningful density maps containing quantitative spatial information using only count-level annotations (i.e., total number of people) during training. To achieve this, Count2Density generates pseudo-density maps leveraging past predictions stored in a Historical Map Bank, thereby reducing confirmation bias. This bank is initialised using an unsupervised saliency estimator to provide an initial spatial prior and is iteratively updated with an EMA of predicted density maps. These pseudo-density maps are obtained by sampling locations from estimated crowd areas using a hypergeometric distribution, with the number of samplings determined by the count-level annotations. To further enhance the spatial awareness of the model, we add a self-supervised contrastive spatial regulariser to encourage similar feature representations within crowded regions while maximising dissimilarity with background regions. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms cross-domain adaptation methods and achieves better results than recent state-of-the-art approaches in semi-supervised settings across several datasets. Additional analyses validate the effectiveness of each individual component of our pipeline, confirming the ability of Count2Density to effectively retrieve spatial information from count-level annotations and enabling accurate subregion counting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2025.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  2. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  3. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  4. 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 251
  5. 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
  6. 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
  7. 2020NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localizationcited by 151
  8. 2018Context-Aware Crowd Countingcited by 150
  9. 2020JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Methodcited by 109
  10. 2017Amulet: Aggregating Multi-level Convolutional Features for Salient Object Detectioncited by 93
  11. 2022Boosting Crowd Counting via Multifaceted Attentioncited by 73
  12. 2023Guiding Pseudo-labels with Uncertainty Estimation for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 65
16 more
  1. 2021TransCrowd: weakly-supervised crowd counting with transformerscited by 61
  2. 2018Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Crowd Counting by Learning to Rankcited by 57
  3. 2023CrowdCLIP: Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Vision-Language Modelcited by 47
  4. 2023STEERER: Resolving Scale Variations for Counting and Localization via Selective Inheritance Learningcited by 41
  5. 2020Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Taskscited by 35
  6. 2020Towards Using Count-level Weak Supervision for Crowd Countingcited by 33
  7. 2020Learning to Count in the Crowd from Limited Labeled Datacited by 27
  8. 2021Leveraging Self-Supervision for Cross-Domain Crowd Countingcited by 24
  9. 2022Texture-guided Saliency Distilling for Unsupervised Salient Object Detectioncited by 24
  10. 2023Calibrating Uncertainty for Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 22
  11. 2020Active Crowd Counting with Limited Supervisioncited by 20
  12. 2020Focus on Semantic Consistency for Cross-domain Crowd Understandingcited by 16
  13. 2021Crowd Counting via Perspective-Guided Fractional-Dilation Convolutioncited by 15
  14. 2022Bi-level Alignment for Cross-Domain Crowd Countingcited by 8
  15. 2022Joint CNN and Transformer Network via weakly supervised Learning for efficient crowd countingcited by 6
  16. 2022Glance to Count: Learning to Rank with Anchors for Weakly-supervised Crowd Countingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.