Humanizing Machines: Rethinking LLM Anthropomorphism Through a Multi-Level Framework of Design
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit anthropomorphism characteristics -- human-like qualities portrayed across their outlook, language, behavior, and reasoning functions. Such characteristics enable more intuitive and engaging human-AI interactions. However, current research on anthropomorphism remains predominantly risk-focused, emphasizing over-trust and user deception while offering limited design guidance. We argue that anthropomorphism should instead be treated as a concept of design that can be intentionally tuned to support user goals. Drawing from multiple disciplines, we propose that the anthropomorphism of an LLM-based artifact should reflect the interaction between artifact designers and interpreters. This interaction is facilitated by cues embedded in the artifact by the designers and the (cognitive) responses of the interpreters to the cues. Cues are categorized into four dimensions: textitperceptive, linguistic, behavioral, and textitcognitive. By analyzing the manifestation and effectiveness of each cue, we provide a unified taxonomy with actionable levers for practitioners. Consequently, we advocate for function-oriented evaluations of anthropomorphic design.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
32 of 119 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Guess What I am Thinking: A Benchmark for Inner Thought Reasoning of Role-Playing Language Agents11 Mar
- 2025Social Genome: Grounded Social Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Models21 Feb
- 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoning19 Feb
Other references · 29
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 212
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
- 2023Lawyer LLaMA Technical Reportcited by 54
- 2023Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBenchcited by 54
- 2025Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanismscited by 50
- 2025A Survey of Large Language Model Agents for Question Answeringcited by 48
- 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 47
- 2024Embodied-RAG: General Non-parametric Embodied Memory for Retrieval and Generationcited by 44
- 2024Believing Anthropomorphism: Examining the Role of Anthropomorphic Cues on Trust in Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2024AI PERSONA: Towards Life-long Personalization of LLMscited by 32
17 more
- 2022Speech Synthesis with Mixed Emotionscited by 28
- 2023Who is ChatGPT? Benchmarking LLMs' Psychological Portrayal Using PsychoBenchcited by 28
- 2025Multi-turn Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion Dynamicscited by 19
- 2024Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding what humans want from their agentscited by 18
- 2024Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliancecited by 16
- 2024The Illusion of Empathy: How AI Chatbots Shape Conversation Perceptioncited by 12
- 2025HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMscited by 12
- 2025AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humanscited by 10
- 2025Embracing Contradiction: Theoretical Inconsistency Will Not Impede the Road of Building Responsible AI Systemscited by 8
- 2024"I Like Sunnie More Than I Expected!": Exploring User Expectation and Perception of an Anthropomorphic LLM-based Conversational Agent for Well-Being Supportcited by 5
- 2024When LLMs Learn to be Students: The SOEI Framework for Modeling and Evaluating Virtual Student Agents in Educational Interactioncited by 4
- 2025RoboReflect: A Robotic Reflective Reasoning Framework for Grasping Ambiguous-Condition Objectscited by 4
- 2025Affective and Conversational Predictors of Re-Engagement in Human-Robot Interactions -- A Student-Centered Study with A Humanoid Social Robotcited by 3
- 2021Speaking of Trust -- Speech as a Measure of Trustcited by 1
- 2022The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Trust in an Industrial Human-Robot Interactioncited by 1
- 2025Robot Error Awareness Through Human Reactions: Implementation, Evaluation, and Recommendationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 7.
11 papers.
- 2025The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMscited by 36
- 2025Hire Your Anthropologist! Rethinking Culture Benchmarks Through an Anthropological Lenscited by 14
- 2026The Chameleon's Limit: Investigating Persona Collapse and Homogenization in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026Towards Valid Student Simulation with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Do Persona-Infused LLMs Affect Performance in a Strategic Reasoning Game?cited by 4
- 2025Love First, Know Later: Persona-Based Romantic Compatibility Through LLM Text World Enginescited by 3
- 2026Sentipolis: Emotion-Aware Agents for Social Simulationscited by 2
- 2026The Psychology of Learning from Machines: Anthropomorphic AI and the Paradox of Automation in Educationcited by 1
- 2026Implicit Humanization in Everyday LLM Moral Judgmentscited by 0
- 2026Not What, But How: A Framework for Auditing LLM Responses across Positioning, Generalization, Anthropomorphism, and Maximscited by 0
- 2026The Epistemic Politics of AI Anthropomorphismcited by 0
- 2026The Epistemic Politics of AI Anthropomorphism2 Aug 2026
- 2026Not What, But How: A Framework for Auditing LLM Responses across Positioning, Generalization, Anthropomorphism, and Maxims1 Jun 2026
- 2026The Chameleon's Limit: Investigating Persona Collapse and Homogenization in Large Language Models27 Apr 2026
- 2026Implicit Humanization in Everyday LLM Moral Judgments23 Mar 2026
- 2026Sentipolis: Emotion-Aware Agents for Social Simulations25 Jan 2026
- 2026Towards Valid Student Simulation with Large Language Models9 Jan 2026
- 2026The Psychology of Learning from Machines: Anthropomorphic AI and the Paradox of Automation in Education7 Jan 2026
- 2025Do Persona-Infused LLMs Affect Performance in a Strategic Reasoning Game?7 Dec 2025
- 2025Love First, Know Later: Persona-Based Romantic Compatibility Through LLM Text World Engines4 Dec 2025
- 2025Hire Your Anthropologist! Rethinking Culture Benchmarks Through an Anthropological Lens7 Oct 2025
- 2025The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs3 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research
- 2023Machine Psychology
- 2026A Scoping Review of the Ethical Perspectives on Anthropomorphising Large Language Model-Based Conversational Agents
- 2026From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-Agent Collaboration: A Vision, Design Philosophy, and an Empirical Framework for Achieving Successful Partnerships Between Humans and LLM Agents
- 2025LLMCode: Evaluating and Enhancing Researcher-AI Alignment in Qualitative Analysis ↗
- 2026Distorted Perspectives of LLM-Simulated Preferences: Can AI Mislead Design? ↗
- 2025DesignerlyLoop: Forming Design Intent through Curated Reasoning for Human-LLM Alignment
- 2025Mind the Gap: The Divergence Between Human and LLM-Generated Tasks