mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Affective and Conversational Predictors of Re-Engagement in Human-Robot Interactions -- A Student-Centered Study with A Humanoid Social Robot

arXiv 2503.16449 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humanoid social robots are increasingly present in daily life, making sustained user engagement a critical factor for their effectiveness and acceptance. While prior work has often examined affective evaluations or anthropomorphic design, less is known about the relative influence of dynamic conversational qualities and perceived robot characteristics in determining a user's intention to re-engage with Large Language Model (LLM)-driven social robots. In this study, 68 participants interacted in open-ended conversations with the Nadine humanoid social robot, completing pre- and post-interaction surveys to assess changes in robot perception, conversational quality, and intention to re-engage. The results showed that verbal interaction significantly improved the robot's perceived characteristics, with statistically significant increases in pleasantness (p<.0001) and approachability (p<.0001), and a reduction in creepiness (p<.001). However, these affective changes were not strong and unique predictors of users' intention to re-engage in a multiple regression model. Instead, participants' perceptions of the interestingness (β=0.60, p<.001) and naturalness (β=0.31, p=0.015) of the robot's conversation emerged as the most significant and robust independent predictors of intention to re-engage. Overall, the results highlight that conversational quality, specifically perceived interestingness and naturalness, is the dominant driver of re-engagement, indicating that LLM-driven robot design should prioritize engaging, natural dialogue over affective impression management or anthropomorphic cues.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

10 of 65 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022Duplex Conversation: Towards Human-like Interaction in Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 28
  2. 2021Perceived Safety in Physical Human Robot Interaction -- A Surveycited by 9
  3. 2022Artificial Emotional Intelligence in Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults: A Pilot Studycited by 9
  4. 2017Sympathy Begins with a Smile, Intelligence Begins with a Word: Use of Multimodal Features in Spoken Human-Robot Interactioncited by 3
  5. 2024AV-EmoDialog: Chat with Audio-Visual Users Leveraging Emotional Cuescited by 3
  6. 2021Creepy Technology: What Is It and How Do You Measure It?cited by 2
  7. 2021Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human-Robot Interaction based on Subjective and Objective Measurescited by 2
  8. 2024Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES)cited by 2
  9. 2024Emotional Tandem Robots: How Different Robot Behaviors Affect Human Perception While Controlling a Mobile Robotcited by 1
  10. 2025What Can You Say to a Robot? Capability Communication Leads to More Natural Conversationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.