mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robot Error Awareness Through Human Reactions: Implementation, Evaluation, and Recommendations

arXiv 2501.05723 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025cs.RO cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective error detection is crucial to prevent task disruption and maintain user trust. Traditional methods often rely on task-specific models or user reporting, which can be inflexible or slow. Recent research suggests social signals, naturally exhibited by users in response to robot errors, can enable more flexible, timely error detection. However, most studies rely on post hoc analysis, leaving their real-time effectiveness uncertain and lacking user-centric evaluation. In this work, we developed a proactive error detection system that combines user behavioral signals (facial action units and speech), user feedback, and error context for automatic error detection. In a study (N = 28), we compared our proactive system to a status quo reactive approach. Results show our system 1) reliably and flexibly detects error, 2) detects errors faster than the reactive approach, and 3) is perceived more favorably by users than the reactive one. We discuss recommendations for enabling robot error awareness in future HRI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.